Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25502927›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Profile of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a tropical medicine reference center, Northern Italy.

Federico Gobbi, Andrea Angheben, Mariella Anselmi, Chiara Postiglione, Ernestina Repetto, Dora Buonfrate, Stefania Marocco, Stefano Tais, Andrea Chiampan, Paride Mainardi and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AutochthonousPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico GobbiCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Andrea AnghebenCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Mariella AnselmiCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy; Centre for Community Epidemiology and Tropical Medicine (CECOMET), Esmeraldas, Ecuador.
Chiara PostiglionePrevention Department, ULSS 20, Verona, Italy.
Ernestina RepettoOperational Center Bruxelles, Médecins Sans Frontières, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Dora BuonfrateCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Stefania MaroccoCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Stefano TaisCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Andrea ChiampanCardiology Unit, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Paride MainardiRadiology Unit, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Zeno BisoffiCentre for Tropical Diseases (CTD), Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITMédecins Sans Frontières · BEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease (CD) is endemic in Central and South America, Mexico and even in some areas of the United States. However, cases have been increasingly recorded also in non-endemic countries. The estimated number of infected people in Europe is in a wide range of 14000 to 181000 subjects, mostly resident in Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsRetrospective, observational study describing the characteristics of patients with CD who attended the Centre for Tropical Diseases (Negrar, Verona, Italy) between 2005 and 2013. All the patients affected by CD underwent chest X-ray, ECG, echocardiography, barium X-ray of the oesophagus and colonic enema. They were classified in the indeterminate, cardiac, digestive or mixed category according to the results of the screening tests. Treatment with benznidazole (or nifurtimox in case of intolerance to the first line therapy) was offered to all patients, excluding the ones with advanced cardiomiopathy, pregnant and lactating women. Patients included were 332 (73.9% women). We classified 68.1% of patients as having Indeterminate Chagas, 11.1% Cardiac Chagas, 18.7% as Digestive Chagas and 2.1% as Mixed Form. Three hundred and twenty-one patients (96.7%) were treated with benznidazole, and most of them (83.2%) completed the treatment. At least one adverse effect was reported by 27.7% of patients, but they were mostly mild. Only a couple of patients received nifurtimox as second line treatment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our case series represents the largest cohort of T. cruzi infected patients diagnosed and treated in Italy. An improvement of the access to diagnosis and cure is still needed, considering that about 9200 infected people are estimated to live in Italy. In general, there is an urgent need of common guidelines to better classify and manage patients with CD in non-endemic countries.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChagas DiseaseChildEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNifurtimoxNitroimidazolesPregnancyRetrospective StudiesbenzonidazoleNifurtimoxNitroimidazoles

Identifiers

PMID25502927
PMCPMC4263408
OpenAlexW2028134063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.