ArticleImmunogenetics2015
Spectratype analysis of the T cell receptor δ CDR3 region of bovine γδ T cells responding to leptospira.
Article in Immunogenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of the domestic goat γδ T cell receptor gene loci and gene usage.Immunogenetics · 2021Article
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptide E7/HLA-DRB1 tetramers with different HLA-DR alleles bound CD4Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gamma delta T cells comprise the majority of blood T cells in ruminants at birth and remain at high levels for several years with most expressing the WC1 co-receptor. A subpopulation of Bos taurus WC1(+) cells expressing a restricted set of WC1 molecules respond immediately by proliferation and interferon-γ production to leptospira following vaccination, preceding the response by CD4 T cells. Our goal is to define the γδ T cell recognition elements involved. Previously, we showed that the responding cells employed a variety of TRDV genes indicating that the CDR1 and CDR2 of TCRδ could vary and may not be principally involved in antigen specificity. Murine and human γδ T cells bind T22 and self lipids through their CDR3δ. Like mice, cattle use up to five TRDD genes in a single CDR3δ adding flexibility to length and configuration for antigen binding. Here, we used spectratyping to evaluate the CDR3δ of leptospira-responsive cells. Little or no compartmentalization of CDR3δ was found for antigen-responsive cells that incorporated TRDV1, TRDV2, or TRDV3 even though they comprise the majority of the leptospira-responding population. Compartmentalization occurred for TRDV4-containing transcripts and was maintained over time and among cattle. However, no common amino acid motif was apparent in those CDR3δ sequences, although a bias in D gene usage occurred. We hypothesize that the restricted set of WC1 co-receptors expressed by the responding cells may lend specificity to the response through their ability to bind bacteria facilitating interaction of various TCRs with bacterial components resulting in cross-linking and activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.