Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25502323›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2015

Active amplification in insect ears: mechanics, models and molecules.

Natasha Mhatre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Exceptional Is the Ear?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Review
  2. The auditory efferent system in mosquitoes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Coevolution of cognitive abilities and identity signals in individual recognition systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Material stiffness variation in mosquito antennae.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  6. Travelling waves and tonotopicity in the inner ear: a historical and comparative perspective.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Active auditory mechanics in female black‑horned tree crickets (Oecanthus nigricornis).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Insect hearing: from physics to ecology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Natasha MhatreSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK, natasha.mhatre@gmail.com.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active amplification in auditory systems is a unique and sophisticated mechanism that expends energy in amplifying the mechanical input to the auditory system, to increase its sensitivity and acuity. Although known for decades from vertebrates, active auditory amplification was only discovered in insects relatively recently. It was first discovered from two dipterans, mosquitoes and flies, who hear with their light and compliant antennae; only recently has it been observed in the stiffer and heavier tympanal ears of an orthopteran. The discovery of active amplification in two distinct insect lineages with independently evolved ears, suggests that the trait may be ancestral, and other insects may possess it as well. This opens up extensive research possibilities in the field of acoustic communication, not just in auditory biophysics, but also in behaviour and neurobiology. The scope of this review is to establish benchmarks for identifying the presence of active amplification in an auditory system and to review the evidence we currently have from different insect ears. I also review some of the models that have been posited to explain the mechanism, both from vertebrates and insects and then review the current mechanical, neurobiological and genetic evidence for each of these models.

Indexed as

AnimalsEarHearingInsectaModels, BiologicalNeurons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.