Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25502065›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2015

Phase 1 safety assessment of intrathecal oxytocin.

James C Eisenach, Chuanyao Tong, Regina Curry

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pituitary Hormones and Orofacial Pain.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Oxytocin, GABA, and TRPV1, the Analgesic Triad?Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  8. [Effect of oxytocin on human pain perception].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2016
    Review
  9. Successful Pain Management with Epidural Oxytocin.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James C EisenachFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Chuanyao Tong
Regina Curry
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

WORKER PROTECTION AGAINST AIRBORNE INFLUENZA - A PILOT STUDYM01RR007122 · NCRR · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUNDLEY, WILLIAM GREGORY · 1992 to 2010
$35.2M
Receptor Selective Spinal AnalgesiaR37GM048085 · NIGMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EISENACH, JAMES · 2011 to 2020
$3.7M
CATALYSIS OF LEADER PEPTIDASER21GM048805 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DALBEY, ROSS E · 1995 to 1996
–
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR007122NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM048085NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM48805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical data suggest that oxytocin reduces hypersensitivity by actions in the spinal cord, but whether it produces antinociception to acute stimuli is unclear. In this article, the authors examined the safety of intrathecal oxytocin and screened its effects on acute noxious stimuli.

methodsAfter institutional review board and Food and Drug Administration approval, healthy adult volunteers received 5, 15, 50, or 150 μg intrathecal oxytocin in a dose-escalating manner in cohorts of five subjects. Hemodynamic and neurologic assessments were performed for 4 h after injections and 24 h later, at which time serum sodium was also measured. Cerebrospinal fluid was obtained 60 min after injection, and responses to noxious heat stimuli in arm and leg as well as temporal summation to repeated application of a von Frey filament were obtained.

resultsOne subject receiving the highest dose experienced transient hypotension and bradycardia as well as subjective numbness in a lumbo-sacral distribution. No other subject experienced subjective or objective neurologic symptoms. Overall, blood pressure and heart rate increased 1 to 4 h after injection by less than 15% with no dose dependency. There was no effect on serum sodium, and cerebrospinal fluid oxytocin increased in a dose-dependent manner after injection. Pain scores to noxious heat stimuli were unaffected by oxytocin, and the temporal summation protocol failed to show summation before or after drug treatment.

conclusionThis small study supports further investigation on oxytocin for analgesia for hypersensitivity states, with continued systematic surveillance for possible effects on blood pressure, heart rate, and neurologic function.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHot TemperatureHumansInjections, SpinalMaleMiddle AgedOxytocinPain MeasurementPatient SafetyPhysical StimulationAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID25502065
PMCPMC5242190
OpenAlexW2113714485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.