ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015
MicroPET imaging of tumor angiogenesis and monitoring on antiangiogenic therapy with an (18)F labeled RGD-based probe in SKOV-3 xenograft-bearing mice.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pretreatment PET/CT imaging of angiogenesis based onEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019Trial
- Peptides for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Conjugation of arginylglycylaspartic acid to human serum albumin decreases the tumor-targeting effect of albumin by hindering its secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine-mediated accumulation in tumors.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Imaging Tumor Vascularity and Response to Anti-Angiogenic Therapy Using Gaussia Luciferase.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
So far, there is no satisfactory imaging modality to monitor antiangiogenesis therapy of ovarian cancer noninvasively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and sensibility of an (18)F labeled Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide in imaging and monitoring antiangiogenic responds in SKOV-3 xenograft-bearing mice. (18)F-FB-NH-PEG4-E[PEG4-c(RGDfK)]2 (denoted as (18)F-RGD2) was synthesized and employed in this study. Mice bearing ovarian cancer SKOV-3 tumors were used for biodistribution and microPET imaging studies compared with (18)F-FDG imaging. Animals were treated with low-dose paclitaxel and the effect of paclitaxel therapy on (18)F-RGD2 accumulation was investigated. Microvascular density (MVD) of SKOV-3 tumors was detected to assess the reliability of (18)F-RGD2 in antiangiogenesis monitoring. Biodistribution studies for (18)F-RGD2 revealed favorable in vivo pharmacokinetic properties, with significant levels of receptor-specific tumor uptake determined via blocking studies. MicroPET imaging results demonstrated high contrast visualization of SKOV-3 tumors. And tumor to background ratio (T/NT) of (18)F-RGD2 uptake was significantly higher than that of (18)F-FDG. Studies on antiangiogenic therapy demonstrated percentage of injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) tumor uptake of (18)F-RGD2 which was obviously decreased in the treatment group than the control group, especially at 60 min (by 31.31 ± 7.18 %, P = 0.009) and 120 min (by 38.92 ± 8.31 %, P < 0.001) after injection of (18)F-RGD2. MVD measurement of SKOV-3 tumors confirmed the finding of the biodistribution studies in monitoring antiangiogenesis therapy. (18)F-RGD2, with favorable biodistribution properties and specific affinity, is a promising tracer for tumor imaging and monitoring antiangiogenesis therapy in ovarian cancer SKOV-3 xenograft-bearing mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25501513What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.