Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25500958›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2015

Decision making in displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: fracture or surgeon based?

Gertraud Gradl, Matthias Knobe, Hans-Christoph Pape, Paul Valentin Neuhaus, David Ring, Thierry Guitton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Mid- to long-term outcomes of proximal humerus fractures treated with open reduction, plate fixation, and iliac bone autograft augmentation.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gertraud GradlTrauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Aachen Medical Center, Aachen, Germany, ggradl@ukaachen.de.
Matthias Knobe
Hans-Christoph Pape
Paul Valentin Neuhaus
David Ring
Thierry Guitton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to analyse the factors that influence surgeon decision-making in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures that might be considered for arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation.

methodsA total of 217 surgeons evaluated radiographs and clinical vignettes of ten patients with fractures of the proximal humerus. In addition to radiographs, we provided patient age, sex, trauma mechanism, activity level (sedentary-vigorously active), and physical status (normal healthy-moribund). Observers were asked to: (1) choose open reduction and internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty (closed question, one option) and (2) to briefly describe the factors that led to their decision (open-ended question). We assessed interobserver reliability using the Fleiss generalized kappa and analysed factors that influenced decision-making according to treatment choice.

resultsInternal fixation was the preferred treatment for the majority of fractures. The overall multirater agreement was fair (κ = 0.30), with a 75 % proportion of agreement. When asked to describe the factors that influenced decision-making, surgeons favouring internal fixation described patient-based factors in 52 %, fracture morphology in 51 %, surgeon factors in 42 %, and bone quality in 11 %. In contrast, fracture morphology was the most common factor (67 %) described by surgeons recommending replacement. Patient age, sex, activity level, physical status and the presence of angular displacement were associated with a recommendation for internal fixation.

conclusionThere is substantial variation in recommendations for internal fixation vs. arthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus that arises in large part from patient and surgeon factors.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyDecision MakingFracture Fixation, InternalAdultAgedClinical CompetenceFemaleHemiarthroplastyHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.