Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25500785›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015

Minnesota's Early Experience with Medical Home Implementation: Viewpoints from the Front Lines.

Patricia Fontaine, Robin Whitebird, Leif I Solberg, Juliana Tillema, Angela Smithson, Benjamin F Crabtree

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Italian Consensus Statement on Patient Engagement in Chronic Care: Process and Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transforming primary care: scoping review of research and practice.Journal of integrated care (Brighton, England) · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Don't Believe Everything You Think.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patricia FontaineHealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, PO Box 1524, MS 23301A, Minneapolis, MN, 55440-1524, USA, Patricia.L.Fontaine@HealthPartners.Com.
Robin Whitebird
Leif I Solberg
Juliana Tillema
Angela Smithson
Benjamin F Crabtree

Funding

Evaluating Statewide Transformation of Primary Care to Medical HomesR18HS019161 · AHRQ · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI SOLBERG, LEIF I · 2010 to 2011
$596k
AHRQ HHS 1R18HS019161AHRQ HHS R18 HS019161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence is evolving about the impact of patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) on important outcomes in primary care. Minnesota has developed its own PCMH certification process, envisioned as an all-payer initiative with an emphasis on patient-centeredness, which may add unique experiences and outcomes to the national discussion.

objectiveWe aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers encountered by nine diverse primary care practices selected from the first 80 to achieve PCMH certification in Minnesota.

designThis was a qualitative analysis of semi-structured, in-person interviews.

participantsThirty-one administrative and clinical leaders, including clinic managers, physician champions, medical directors, nursing supervisors, and care coordinators participated in the study. KEY

resultsSix factors emerged as most important to the efforts to become PMCHs: leadership support, organizational culture, finances, quality improvement (QI) experience, information technology (IT) resources, and patient involvement. Facilitators included committed leadership at local and higher levels, prior experience and ongoing support for QI initiatives, and adequate financial and IT resources. Reimbursement was a significant barrier due to perceived inadequacy and inconsistent participation by health plans. The unsuitability of electronic medical records (EMRs) to PCMH documentation requirements likewise presented ongoing challenges. Many interviewees described patient input as helpful to their clinics' PCMH-related changes and were enthusiastic about their "patient partners." The majority of interviewees felt that becoming a PCMH was right for patients and was personally worthwhile, even while acknowledging the tremendous effort involved and voicing skepticism about reimbursement over the short term.

conclusionsThe experience of participants in Minnesota's state-wide initiative to legislate PCMH transformation provides a broad view of facilitators and barriers. Unique facilitators included a requirement for patient involvement, which pushed practices to create patient-centered innovations, and new reimbursement models based on quality indicators for a population. Among barriers were the costs to practices and patients, and EMRs that failed to accommodate PCMH requirements.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFemaleHealthcare FinancingHealth Services ResearchHumansLeadershipMaleMinnesotaOrganizational CulturePatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID25500785
PMCPMC4471008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.