ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2015
Minnesota's Early Experience with Medical Home Implementation: Viewpoints from the Front Lines.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The role of champions in the implementation of technology in healthcare services: a systematic mixed studies review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Middle managers' role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- The self-perceived role of tech champions in municipal healthcare services-a descriptive qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The patient as a prosumer of healthcare: insights from a bibliometric-interpretive review.Journal of health organization and management · 2022Article
- Quality and team care response to the pandemic stresses in high performing primary care practices: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2022Article
- The Role of the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Treating Depression.Current psychiatry reports · 2020Review
- Italian Consensus Statement on Patient Engagement in Chronic Care: Process and Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Leading Innovative Practice: Leadership Attributes in LEAP Practices.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Article
- Patient Centred Medical Home (PCMH) transitions in western Sydney, Australia: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Mixed method evaluation of Relational Team Development (RELATED) to improve team-based care for complex patients with mental illness in primary care.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- Sustainable care coordination: a qualitative study of primary care provider, administrator, and insurer perspectives.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Pathways to Medical Home Recognition: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the PCMH Transformation Process.Health services research · 2018Article
- Transforming primary care: scoping review of research and practice.Journal of integrated care (Brighton, England) · 2018Article
- Promoting Patient and Family Partnerships in Ambulatory Care Improvement: A Narrative Review and Focus Group Findings.Advances in therapy · 2016Review
- Concept Mapping as a Method to Engage Patients in Clinical Quality Improvement.Annals of family medicine · 2016Article
- Don't Believe Everything You Think.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Patient-Centered Models of Care: Closing the Gaps in Physician Readiness.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Article
- Implementation of Practice Transformation: Patient Experience According to Practice Leaders.Quality management in health careArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence is evolving about the impact of patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) on important outcomes in primary care. Minnesota has developed its own PCMH certification process, envisioned as an all-payer initiative with an emphasis on patient-centeredness, which may add unique experiences and outcomes to the national discussion.
objectiveWe aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers encountered by nine diverse primary care practices selected from the first 80 to achieve PCMH certification in Minnesota.
designThis was a qualitative analysis of semi-structured, in-person interviews.
participantsThirty-one administrative and clinical leaders, including clinic managers, physician champions, medical directors, nursing supervisors, and care coordinators participated in the study. KEY
resultsSix factors emerged as most important to the efforts to become PMCHs: leadership support, organizational culture, finances, quality improvement (QI) experience, information technology (IT) resources, and patient involvement. Facilitators included committed leadership at local and higher levels, prior experience and ongoing support for QI initiatives, and adequate financial and IT resources. Reimbursement was a significant barrier due to perceived inadequacy and inconsistent participation by health plans. The unsuitability of electronic medical records (EMRs) to PCMH documentation requirements likewise presented ongoing challenges. Many interviewees described patient input as helpful to their clinics' PCMH-related changes and were enthusiastic about their "patient partners." The majority of interviewees felt that becoming a PCMH was right for patients and was personally worthwhile, even while acknowledging the tremendous effort involved and voicing skepticism about reimbursement over the short term.
conclusionsThe experience of participants in Minnesota's state-wide initiative to legislate PCMH transformation provides a broad view of facilitators and barriers. Unique facilitators included a requirement for patient involvement, which pushed practices to create patient-centered innovations, and new reimbursement models based on quality indicators for a population. Among barriers were the costs to practices and patients, and EMRs that failed to accommodate PCMH requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.