Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25500559›Full record

SynthesisHealth policy and planning2015

Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review.

Maryse C Kok, Marjolein Dieleman, Miriam Taegtmeyer, Jacqueline E W Broerse, Sumit S Kane, Hermen Ormel, Mandy M Tijm, Korrie A M de Koning

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health policy and planning, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03376607 (Community- and mHealth-Based Integrated Management of Diabetes in Primary Healthcare in Rwanda), which is not on this map. Cited by 341 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
341citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03376607 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Community- and mHealth-Based Integrated Management of Diabetes in Primary Healthcare in Rwanda: The D²Rwanda Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2019 to 2021Enrolled209ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Telemedicine, Community Health WorkersArmsHBCP programme, mobile health application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

341 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. A Rapid Realist Review of Group Psychological First Aid for Humanitarian Workers and Volunteers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

281 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maryse C KokKIT Health, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Maryse.kok@kit.nl.
Marjolein DielemanKIT Health, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK and.
Jacqueline E W BroerseAthena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sumit S KaneKIT Health, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hermen OrmelKIT Health, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mandy M TijmKIT Health, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Korrie A M de KoningKIT Health, Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly recognized as an integral component of the health workforce needed to achieve public health goals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many factors influence CHW performance. A systematic review was conducted to identify intervention design related factors influencing performance of CHWs. We systematically searched six databases for quantitative and qualitative studies that included CHWs working in promotional, preventive or curative primary health services in LMICs. One hundred and forty studies met the inclusion criteria, were quality assessed and double read to extract data relevant to the design of CHW programmes. A preliminary framework containing factors influencing CHW performance and characteristics of CHW performance (such as motivation and competencies) guided the literature search and review.A mix of financial and non-financial incentives, predictable for the CHWs, was found to be an effective strategy to enhance performance, especially of those CHWs with multiple tasks. Performance-based financial incentives sometimes resulted in neglect of unpaid tasks. Intervention designs which involved frequent supervision and continuous training led to better CHW performance in certain settings. Supervision and training were often mentioned as facilitating factors, but few studies tested which approach worked best or how these were best implemented. Embedment of CHWs in community and health systems was found to diminish workload and increase CHW credibility. Clearly defined CHW roles and introduction of clear processes for communication among different levels of the health system could strengthen CHW performance.When designing community-based health programmes, factors that increased CHW performance in comparable settings should be taken into account. Additional intervention research to develop a better evidence base for the most effective training and supervision mechanisms and qualitative research to inform policymakers in development of CHW interventions are needed.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareCommunity Health WorkersDeveloping CountriesHumansMotivationCommunity health workerslow- and middle-income countriesperformancesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID25500559
PMCPMC4597042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.