Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25499546›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2015

Efficacy of early neonatal supplementation with vitamin A to reduce mortality in infancy in Haryana, India (Neovita): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Sarmila Mazumder, Sunita Taneja, Kiran Bhatia, Sachiyo Yoshida, Jasmine Kaur, Brinda Dube, G S Toteja, Rajiv Bahl, Olivier Fontaine, Jose Martines and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01138449 (Efficacy of Neonatal Vitamin A Supplementation in Improving Child Survival in Haryana, India), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01138449 nacompletednot on this map

Efficacy of Neonatal Vitamin A Supplementation in Improving Child Survival in Haryana, India: Generation of Evidence Necessary for Informing Global Policy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSociety for Applied StudiesRan2010 to 2013Enrolled44,984ConditionsNeonatal Vitamin A SupplementationArmsVitamin A
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Neonatal vitamin A supplementation and immune responses to oral polio vaccine in Zimbabwean infants.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2019
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sarmila MazumderCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Sunita TanejaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Kiran BhatiaCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Sachiyo YoshidaDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jasmine KaurCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
Brinda DubeCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India.
G S TotejaCentre for Promotion of Nutrition Research and Training, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Rajiv BahlDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Olivier FontaineDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jose MartinesCentre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nita BhandariCentre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies, New Delhi, India. Electronic address: CHRD@sas.org.in.
Neovita India Study Group
Society for Applied Studies · INWorld Health Organization - Pakistan · PKIndian Council of Medical Research · INUniversity of Bergen · NOWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin A supplementation in children aged 6 months to 5 years has been shown to reduce mortality. The efficacy of neonatal supplementation with vitamin A to reduce mortality in the first 6 months of life is plausible but not established. We aimed to assess the efficacy of neonatal oral supplementation with vitamin A to reduce mortality between supplementation and 6 months of age.

methodsWe undertook an individually randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Haryana, India. We identified pregnant women through a surveillance programme undertaken every 3 months of all female residents in two districts of Haryana, India, aged 15-49 years, and screened every identified livebirth. Eligible participants were neonates whose parents consented to participate, were likely to stay in the study area until at least 6 months of age, and were able to feed orally at the time of enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned to receive oral capsules containing vitamin A (retinol palmitate 50,000 IU plus vitamin E 9·5-12·6 IU) or placebo (vitamin E 9·5-12·6 IU) within 72 h of birth. Randomisation was in blocks of 20 according to a randomisation list prepared by a statistician not otherwise involved with the trial. Investigators, participants' families, and the data analysis team were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was mortality between supplementation and 6 months of age. Analysis included all participants assigned to study groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01138449, and the Indian Council of Medical Research Clinical Trial Registry, number CTRI/2010/091/000220.

findingsBetween June 24, 2010, and July 1, 2012 we screened 47,777 neonates and randomly assigned 44,984 to receive vitamin A (22,493) or placebo (22,491). Between supplementation and 6 months of age, 656 infants died in the vitamin A group compared with 726 in the placebo group (29·2 per 1000 vs 32·3 per 1000; difference -3·1 per 1000, 95% CI -6·3 to 0·1; risk ratio 0·90, 95% CI 0·81 to 1·00). We noted no significant interactions between the intervention effect and sex on mortality at 6 months (p=0·409). Supplementation with 50,000 IU vitamin A within the first 72 h of life was generally safe and well tolerated, with the exception of a small excess risk of transient bulging fontanelle (205 cases in the vitamin A group confirmed by physician vs 80 cases in the placebo group, risk ratio 2·56 [95% CI 1·98-3·32]).

interpretationThe findings of this study, done in a population in which vitamin A deficiency is a moderate public health problem, are consistent with a modest reduction in mortality between supplementation and 6 months of age. These findings must be viewed together with similar trials in other populations to enable determination of appropriate public health policy.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation to WHO.

Indexed as

Administration, OralCapsulesDietary SupplementsDiterpenesDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansIndiaInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaleRetinyl EstersTreatment OutcomeVitamin ACapsulesDiterpenesDrug Combinationsretinol palmitateRetinyl EstersVitamin AVitamin EVitamins

Identifiers

PMID25499546
OpenAlexW2124359426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.