Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25497692›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2015

Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Zilong Xie, W Todd Maddox, Valerie S Knopik, John E McGeary, Bharath Chandrasekaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019
    Article
  3. Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Association Between Genetic Variation inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zilong XieDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
W Todd MaddoxDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Valerie S KnopikDivision of Behavioral Genetics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA; Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
John E McGearyPsychologist, Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, USA; Division of Behavioral Genetics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI 02903, USA; Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Bharath ChandrasekaranDepartment of Communication Sciences & Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic address: bchandra@utexas.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USBrown University · USRhode Island Hospital · US

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment LearningR01DA032457 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BEEVERS, CHRISTOPHER G · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA032457NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032457NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Listeners vary substantially in their ability to recognize speech in noisy environments. Here we examined the role of genetic variation on individual differences in speech recognition in various noise backgrounds. Background noise typically varies in the levels of energetic masking (EM) and informational masking (IM) imposed on target speech. Relative to EM, release from IM is hypothesized to place greater demand on executive function to selectively attend to target speech while ignoring competing noises. Recent evidence suggests that the long allele variant in exon III of the DRD4 gene, primarily expressed in the prefrontal cortex, may be associated with enhanced selective attention to goal-relevant high-priority information even in the face of interference. We investigated the extent to which this polymorphism is associated with speech recognition in IM and EM conditions. In an unscreened adult sample (Experiment 1) and a larger screened replication sample (Experiment 2), we demonstrate that individuals with the DRD4 long variant show better recognition performance in noise conditions involving significant IM, but not in EM conditions. In Experiment 2, we also obtained neuropsychological measures to assess the underlying mechanisms. Mediation analysis revealed that this listening condition-specific advantage was mediated by enhanced executive attention/working memory capacity in individuals with the long allele variant. These findings suggest that DRD4 may contribute specifically to individual differences in speech recognition ability in noise conditions that place demands on executive function.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionExecutive FunctionFemaleGenotypeHumansIndividualityMaleMemory, Short-TermNoisePattern Recognition, PhysiologicalPerceptual MaskingReceptors, Dopamine D4Speech PerceptionYoung AdultDRD4 protein, humanReceptors, Dopamine D4DRD4Executive attention/working memory capacityIndividual differenceInformational maskingSpeech perception

Identifiers

PMID25497692
PMCPMC4297728
OpenAlexW2106456733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.