ArticleBiology direct2014
Genome-scale identification and characterization of moonlighting proteins.
Article in Biology direct, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A high-throughput search for intracellular factors that affect RNA folding identifiesRNA biology · 2024Article
- IdentPMP: identification of moonlighting proteins in plants using sequence-based learning models.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Multiple Forms of Multifunctional Proteins in Health and Disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- The Balancing Act of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Enabling Functional Diversity while Minimizing Promiscuity.Journal of molecular biology · 2019Article
- Article
- Multifunctional Proteins: Involvement in Human Diseases and Targets of Current Drugs.The protein journal · 2018Article
- HFSP: high speed homology-driven function annotation of proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Confronting the catalytic dark matter encoded by sequenced genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- DextMP: deep dive into text for predicting moonlighting proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- NaviGO: interactive tool for visualization and functional similarity and coherence analysis with gene ontology.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Commentary: Systems Biology Approach to Model the Life Cycle ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017Article
- Characterizing the Syphilis-Causing Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum Proteome Using Complementary Mass Spectrometry.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2016Article
- The Expanding Landscape of Moonlighting Proteins in Yeasts.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016Review
- Genome-scale prediction of moonlighting proteins using diverse protein association information.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2016Article
- Hsp31, a member of the DJ-1 superfamily, is a multitasking stress responder with chaperone activity.Prion · 2016Article
- Genome-Wide Detection and Analysis of Multifunctional Genes.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Bioinformatics and Moonlighting Proteins.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMoonlighting proteins perform two or more cellular functions, which are selected based on various contexts including the cell type they are expressed, their oligomerization status, and the binding of different ligands at different sites. To understand overall landscape of their functional diversity, it is important to establish methods that can identify moonlighting proteins in a systematic fashion. Here, we have developed a computational framework to find moonlighting proteins on a genome scale and identified multiple proteomic characteristics of these proteins.
resultsFirst, we analyzed Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of known moonlighting proteins. We found that the GO annotations of moonlighting proteins can be clustered into multiple groups reflecting their diverse functions. Then, by considering the observed GO term separations, we identified 33 novel moonlighting proteins in Escherichia coli and confirmed them by literature review. Next, we analyzed moonlighting proteins in terms of protein-protein interaction, gene expression, phylogenetic profile, and genetic interaction networks. We found that moonlighting proteins physically interact with a higher number of distinct functional classes of proteins than non-moonlighting ones and also found that most of the physically interacting partners of moonlighting proteins share the latter's primary functions. Interestingly, we also found that moonlighting proteins tend to interact with other moonlighting proteins. In terms of gene expression and phylogenetically related proteins, a weak trend was observed that moonlighting proteins interact with more functionally diverse proteins. Structural characteristics of moonlighting proteins, i.e. intrinsic disordered regions and ligand binding sites were also investigated.
conclusionAdditional functions of moonlighting proteins are difficult to identify by experiments and these proteins also pose a significant challenge for computational function annotation. Our method enables identification of novel moonlighting proteins from current functional annotations in public databases. Moreover, we showed that potential moonlighting proteins without sufficient functional annotations can be identified by analyzing available omics-scale data. Our findings open up new possibilities for investigating the multi-functional nature of proteins at the systems level and for exploring the complex functional interplay of proteins in a cell. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Michael Galperin, Eugine Koonin, and Nick Grishin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.