Trial reportEuropean urology2015
Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in European urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 244 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic and Open Radical Cystectomy
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Surgically Placed Rectus Sheath Catheters for Open Radical Cystectomy: Is There a Difference in Patient Outcomes?
Sensitivity of Multiparametric MRI in Differentiation Between Muscle Invasive and Non-muscle Invasive Urinary Bladder Cancer
Who cites it
244 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 590 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with subgroup analyses by orthotopic neobladder utilisation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparing quality of life after robot assisted versus open radical cystectomy: A systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted and open surgery in treating neurogenic bladder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Essential Japanese Guidelines for the Prevention of Perioperative Infections in the Urological Field: 2023 Edition.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025Guideline
- Robotic assisted vs open radical cystectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Robot-assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of Robotic vs Open Cystectomy: A Systematic Review.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Pooled it
- Influence of steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Perioperative outcomes and safety of robotic vs open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,640 cases.World journal of urology · 2021Pooled it
- Short-term morbidity and mortality following radical cystectomy: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Can robotic-assisted radical cystectomy provide patients with a smaller trauma and faster recovery period? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Minimally invasive versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Pooled it
- Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2019Pooled it
- Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Complications and health-related quality of life after robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of four RCTs.Systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- The first United States prospective trial using the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system.BJU international · 2026Trial
184 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOpen radical cystectomy (ORC) and urinary diversion in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) are associated with significant perioperative complication risk.
objectiveTo compare perioperative complications between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) and ORC techniques. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted during 2010 and 2013 in BCa patients scheduled for definitive treatment by radical cystectomy (RC), pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), and urinary diversion. Patients were randomized to ORC/PLND or RARC/PLND, both with open urinary diversion. Patients were followed for 90 d postoperatively.
interventionStandard ORC or RARC with PLND; all urinary diversions were performed via an open approach. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary outcomes were overall 90-d grade 2-5 complications defined by a modified Clavien system. Secondary outcomes included comparison of high-grade complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, pathologic outcomes, 3- and 6-mo patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes, and total operative room and inpatient costs. Differences in binary outcomes were assessed with the chi-square test, with differences in continuous outcomes assessed by analysis of covariance with randomization group as covariate and, for QOL end points, baseline score. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The trial enrolled 124 patients, of whom 118 were randomized and underwent RC/PLND. Sixty were randomized to RARC and 58 to ORC. At 90 d, grade 2-5 complications were observed in 62% and 66% of RARC and ORC patients, respectively (95% confidence interval for difference, -21% to -13%; p=0.7). The similar rates of grade 2-5 complications at our mandated interim analysis met futility criteria; thus, early closure of the trial occurred. The RARC group had lower mean intraoperative blood loss (p=0.027) but significantly longer operative time than the ORC group (p<0.001). Pathologic variables including positive surgical margins and lymph node yields were similar. Mean hospital stay was 8 d in both arms (standard deviation, 3 and 5 d, respectively; p=0.5). Three- and 6-mo QOL outcomes were similar between arms. Cost analysis demonstrated an advantage to ORC compared with RARC. A limitation is the setting at a single high-volume, referral center; our findings may not be generalizable to all settings.
conclusionsThis trial failed to identify a large advantage for robot-assisted techniques over standard open surgery for patients undergoing RC/PLND and urinary diversion. Similar 90-d complication rates, hospital stay, pathologic outcomes, and 3- and 6-mo QOL outcomes were observed regardless of surgical technique. PATIENT SUMMARY: Of 118 patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, and urinary diversion, half were randomized to open surgery and half to robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. We compared the rate of complications within 90 d after surgery for the open group versus the robotic group and found no significant difference between the two groups.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01076387, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.