Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25496766›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Reconstruction of gross avian genome structure, organization and evolution suggests that the chicken lineage most closely resembles the dinosaur avian ancestor.

Michael N Romanov, Marta Farré, Pamela E Lithgow, Katie E Fowler, Benjamin M Skinner, Rebecca O'Connor, Gothami Fonseka, Niclas Backström, Yoichi Matsuda, Chizuko Nishida and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Reptile Evolution and Genetics: An Overview.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolutionary analysis of a complete chicken genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Michael N Romanov
Marta Farré
Pamela E Lithgow
Katie E Fowler
Benjamin M Skinner
Rebecca O'Connor
Gothami Fonseka
Niclas Backström
Yoichi Matsuda
Chizuko Nishida
Peter Houde
Erich D Jarvis
Hans Ellegren
David W Burt
Denis M LarkinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK. dlarkin@rvc.ac.uk.
Darren K Griffin

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D013704/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D013704/2Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E010652/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E024211/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J010170/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K008161Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K008226/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G19438/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of multiple avian genome sequence assemblies greatly improves our ability to define overall genome organization and reconstruct evolutionary changes. In birds, this has previously been impeded by a near intractable karyotype and relied almost exclusively on comparative molecular cytogenetics of only the largest chromosomes. Here, novel whole genome sequence information from 21 avian genome sequences (most newly assembled) made available on an interactive browser (Evolution Highway) was analyzed.

resultsFocusing on the six best-assembled genomes allowed us to assemble a putative karyotype of the dinosaur ancestor for each chromosome. Reconstructing evolutionary events that led to each species' genome organization, we determined that the fastest rate of change occurred in the zebra finch and budgerigar, consistent with rapid speciation events in the Passeriformes and Psittaciformes. Intra- and interchromosomal changes were explained most parsimoniously by a series of inversions and translocations respectively, with breakpoint reuse being commonplace. Analyzing chicken and zebra finch, we found little evidence to support the hypothesis of an association of evolutionary breakpoint regions with recombination hotspots but some evidence to support the hypothesis that microchromosomes largely represent conserved blocks of synteny in the majority of the 21 species analyzed. All but one species showed the expected number of microchromosomal rearrangements predicted by the haploid chromosome count. Ostrich, however, appeared to retain an overall karyotype structure of 2n=80 despite undergoing a large number (26) of hitherto un-described interchromosomal changes.

conclusionsResults suggest that mechanisms exist to preserve a static overall avian karyotype/genomic structure, including the microchromosomes, with widespread interchromosomal change occurring rarely (e.g., in ostrich and budgerigar lineages). Of the species analyzed, the chicken lineage appeared to have undergone the fewest changes compared to the dinosaur ancestor.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsAnimalsChickensChromosome PaintingDinosaursGene OntologyIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypePasseriformesRecombination, GeneticSynteny

Identifiers

PMID25496766
PMCPMC4362836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.