Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25496664›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2014

Molecular signatures that correlate with induction of lens regeneration in newts: lessons from proteomic analysis.

Konstantinos Sousounis, Rital Bhavsar, Mario Looso, Marcus Krüger, Jessica Beebe, Thomas Braun, Panagiotis A Tsonis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Single Cell Atlas of the Newt Iris During Lens Regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Lens regeneration: a historical perspective.The International journal of developmental biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos SousounisDepartment of Biology and Center for Tissue Regeneration and Engineering at Dayton, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH, 45469, USA. sousounisk1@udayton.edu.
Rital BhavsarDepartment of Biology and Center for Tissue Regeneration and Engineering at Dayton, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH, 45469, USA. rbhavsar1@udayton.edu.
Mario LoosoDepartment of Cardiac Development and Remodeling, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Ludwigstrasse 43, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany. mario.looso@mpi-bn.mpg.de.
Marcus KrügerDepartment of Cardiac Development and Remodeling, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Ludwigstrasse 43, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany. marcus.krueger@mpi-bn.mpg.de.
Jessica BeebeDepartment of Biology and Center for Tissue Regeneration and Engineering at Dayton, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH, 45469, USA. beebej1@udayton.edu.
Thomas BraunDepartment of Cardiac Development and Remodeling, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Ludwigstrasse 43, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany. thomas.braun@mpi-bn.mpg.de.
Panagiotis A TsonisDepartment of Biology and Center for Tissue Regeneration and Engineering at Dayton, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH, 45469, USA. ptsonis1@udayton.edu.

Funding

NEI NIH HHS EY10450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmphibians have the remarkable ability to regenerate missing body parts. After complete removal of the eye lens, the dorsal but not the ventral iris will transdifferentiate to regenerate an exact replica of the lost lens. We used reverse-phase nano-liquid chromatography followed by mass spectrometry to detect protein concentrations in dorsal and ventral iris 0, 4, and 8 days post-lentectomy. We performed gene expression comparisons between regeneration and intact timepoints as well as between dorsal and ventral iris.

resultsOur analysis revealed gene expression patterns associated with the ability of the dorsal iris for transdifferentiation and lens regeneration. Proteins regulating gene expression and various metabolic processes were enriched in regeneration timepoints. Proteins involved in extracellular matrix, gene expression, and DNA-associated functions like DNA repair formed a regeneration-related protein network and were all up-regulated in the dorsal iris. In addition, we investigated protein concentrations in cultured dorsal (transdifferentiation-competent) and ventral (transdifferentiation-incompetent) iris pigmented epithelial (IPE) cells. Our comparative analysis revealed that the ability of dorsal IPE cells to keep memory of their tissue of origin and transdifferentiation is associated with the expression of proteins that specify the dorso-ventral axis of the eye as well as with proteins found highly expressed in regeneration timepoints, especially 8 days post-lentectomy.

conclusionsThe study deepens our understanding in the mechanism of regeneration by providing protein networks and pathways that participate in the process.

Indexed as

ProteomicsRegenerationAnimalsCell TransdifferentiationChromatography, LiquidDNA RepairExtracellular MatrixIrisLens, CrystallineReactive Oxygen SpeciesSalamandridaeTandem Mass SpectrometryUp-RegulationReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID25496664
PMCPMC4271507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.