Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25496349›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2015

An item response theory analysis of the sexual compulsivity scale and its correspondence with the hypersexual disorder screening inventory among a sample of highly sexually active gay and bisexual men.

Ana Ventuneac, H Jonathon Rendina, Christian Grov, Brian Mustanski, Jeffrey T Parsons

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Syndemic conditions and HIV transmission risk behavior among HIV-negative gay and bisexual men in a U.S. national sample.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana VentuneacThe Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training (CHEST), New York, NY, USA.
H Jonathon Rendina
Christian Grov
Brian Mustanski
Jeffrey T Parsons

Funding

Compulsive Behaviors, Mental Health, and HIV RiskR01MH087714 · NIMH · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI PARSONS, JEFFREY T · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
Interpersonal and intrapersonal conflict and their association with substance useF31MH095622 · NIMH · CUNY GRADUATE SCH AND UNIV CTR · PI RENDINA, H. JONATHON · 2012 to 2014
$69k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH095622NIMH NIH HHS F31-MH095622NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087714NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNumerous scales and assessments are available to assess sexual compulsivity (SC).

aimThis study sought to conduct an item response theory (IRT) analysis of the Sexual Compulsivity Scale (SCS) to provide evidence about its measurement precision at the various levels of the SC construct in a sample of highly sexually active gay and bisexual men (GBM).

methodsSCS data from a sample of 202 GBM who are highly sexually active but who vary in their experiences of SC symptoms were modeled using Samejima's polytomous graded response IRT model. To describe the performance of the SCS relative to the Hypersexual Disorder Screening Inventory (HDSI), SCS scores were compared with participants' corresponding HDSI results to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy.

main outcome measuresThis study examined the correspondence between the SCS and the HDSI, a diagnostic instrument for the screening of hypersexuality.

resultsIRT analyses indicated that, although two of the SCS items had low reliability, the SCS as a whole was reliable across much of the SC continuum. Scores on the SCS and the HDSI were highly correlated; however, no potential cutoffs on the SCS corresponded strongly with the polythetic scoring criteria of the HDSI.

conclusionComparisons of SCS scores with HDSI results indicated that the SCS itself could not serve as a substitute for the HDSI and would incorrectly classify a substantial number of individuals' levels of hypersexuality. However, the SCS could be a useful screening tool to provide a preliminary screening of people at risk for meeting criteria on the HDSI. Combining the SCS and the HDSI may be an appropriate evaluation strategy in classifying GBM as negative on both (i.e., "non-hypersexual/non-SC"), positive on the SCS only (i.e., "at risk"), and positive on both the SCS and the HDSI (i.e., "problematic hypersexuality/SC").

Indexed as

Sexual BehaviorAdultBisexualityFactor Analysis, StatisticalHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningParaphilic DisordersPersonality InventoryPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsGay and Bisexual MenHypersexual DisorderHypersexualityItem Response TheoryPsychometricsSexual Compulsivity

Identifiers

PMID25496349
PMCPMC4310754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.