Trial reportTrials2014
Ultrafiltration biofeedback guided by blood volume monitoring to reduce intradialytic hypotensive episodes in hemodialysis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01988181 (Blood Volume Monitoring Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback on Reduction of Intra-dialytic Hypotensive Episodes in Hemodialysis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Blood Volume Monitoring Guided Ultrafiltration Biofeedback on Reduction of Intra-dialytic Hypotensive Episodes in Hemodialysis: A Randomized Cross Over Study
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of blood volume biofeedback hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis on cardiovascular stability and blood pressure control in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of nephrology · 2024Pooled it
- Ultrafiltration-sodium profiles and their impact on thirst and xerostomia in hemodialysis patients.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Toward Precision Fluid Management in Hemodialysis: Adaptive Ultrafiltration Guided by Continuous Relative Blood Volume Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Updates in the management of intradialytic hypotension: Emerging strategies and innovations.World journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- Linking Intradialytic Blood Volume Dynamics to Extracellular Fluid Status: Toward Personalized Fluid Assessment in Hemodialysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Validation of Hemoglobin and Hematocrit Measurements from a Dialysis Machine Sensor Compared to Laboratory Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- How to Limit Interdialytic Weight Gain in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: State of the Art and Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A brief review of intradialytic hypotension with a focus on survival.Seminars in dialysis · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFluid removal during dialysis, also known as ultrafiltration (UF), leads to intradialytic hypotension (IDH) in a significant number of patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) and is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. At present, there are no accepted standards of practice for the prevention or treatment of IDH. Relative blood volume monitoring (BVM) is based on the concept that the hematocrit increases with UF, relative to the patient's baseline hematocrit. The use of BVM biofeedback, whereby the HD machine automatically adjusts the rate of UF based on the relative blood volume, has been proposed for the prevention of IDH. METHODS/
designThis is a 22-week randomized crossover trial. Participants undergo a 4-week run-in phase to standardize medications and dialysis prescriptions. Subsequently, participants are randomized to standard HD or to BVM biofeedback for a period of 8 weeks followed by a 2-week washout phase before crossing over. The dialysis prescription remains identical for both arms. The primary outcome is the frequency of symptomatic IDH as defined by an abrupt drop in the systolic blood pressure of ≥ 20 mm Hg accompanied by headache, dizziness, loss of consciousness, thirst, dyspnea, angina, muscle cramps or vomiting. Secondary outcomes include the number of symptomatic IDH episodes and any reduction in IDH episodes, nursing interventions, dialysis adequacy, total body water, extra- and intracellular fluid volumes, brain natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin levels, blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, patient symptoms and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Our study will determine the impact of using BVM biofeedback to prevent IDH and other serious adverse events in susceptible patients.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01988181 (6 November 2013).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.