Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25496002›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Extensive duplication of the Wolbachia DNA in chromosome four of Drosophila ananassae.

Lisa Klasson, Nikhil Kumar, Robin Bromley, Karsten Sieber, Melissa Flowers, Sandra H Ott, Luke J Tallon, Siv G E Andersson, Julie C Dunning Hotopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Long-read genome assemblies for the study of chromosome expansion:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Narrow Genetic Diversity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Complete Genome Sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2019
    Article
  16. Core Concept: Gene transfers from bacteria and viruses may be shaping complex organisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. TheGenetics · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa Klasson
Nikhil Kumar
Robin Bromley
Karsten Sieber
Melissa Flowers
Sandra H Ott
Luke J Tallon
Siv G E Andersson
Julie C Dunning HotoppInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. jdhotopp@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

Research Training in Gastroenterology and HepatologyT32DK067872 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI RAUFMAN, JEAN-PIERRE · 2005 to 2024
$7.2M
Impact of Bacterial-Animal Lateral Gene Transfer on Human HealthDP2OD007372 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DUNNING HOTOPP, JULIE · 2010 to 2010
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK067872NIH HHS 1-DP2-OD007372NIH HHS DP2 OD007372
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLateral gene transfer (LGT) from bacterial Wolbachia endosymbionts has been detected in ~20% of arthropod and nematode genome sequencing projects. Many of these transfers are large and contain a substantial part of the Wolbachia genome.

resultsHere, we re-sequenced three D. ananassae genomes from Asia and the Pacific that contain large LGTs from Wolbachia. We find that multiple copies of the Wolbachia genome are transferred to the Drosophila nuclear genome in all three lines. In the D. ananassae line from Indonesia, the copies of Wolbachia DNA in the nuclear genome are nearly identical in size and sequence yielding an even coverage of mapped reads over the Wolbachia genome. In contrast, the D. ananassae lines from Hawaii and India show an uneven coverage of mapped reads over the Wolbachia genome suggesting that different parts of these LGTs are present in different copy numbers. In the Hawaii line, we find that this LGT is underrepresented in third instar larvae indicative of being heterochromatic. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of mitotic chromosomes confirms that the LGT in the Hawaii line is heterochromatic and represents ~20% of the sequence on chromosome 4 (dot chromosome, Muller element F).

conclusionsThis collection of related lines contain large lateral gene transfers composed of multiple Wolbachia genomes that constitute >2% of the D. ananassae genome (~5 Mbp) and partially explain the abnormally large size of chromosome 4 in D. ananassae.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGene Transfer, HorizontalAnimalsChromosome MappingDNA, BacterialDrosophilaFemaleGene DosageGenome, InsectHeterozygoteMalePolytene ChromosomesSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificitySymbiosisWolbachiaDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID25496002
PMCPMC4299567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.