ArticlePsychology, health & medicine2015
An exploratory mixed methods analysis of adherence predictors following acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Psychology, health & medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a Psychological-Behavioral Intervention in Cardiac Patients Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy: Lessons Learned From the Field.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2020Trial
- Predictors of adherence of enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with coronary heart disease after discharge: A mixed-methods study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Positive psychological constructs and health behavior adherence in heart failure: A qualitative research study.Nursing & health sciences · 2020Article
- Relationships among medication adherence, lifestyle modification, and health-related quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2018Article
- A Positive Psychology Intervention for Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Development and Proof-of-Concept Trial.Journal of happiness studies · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adherence to cardiac health behaviors is a critical predictor of prognosis in the months following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, there has been minimal concomitant study of multiple nonadherence risk factors, as assessed via record review, structured assessments, and qualitative interviews, among hospitalized ACS patients. Accordingly, we completed an exploratory mixed methods study with 22 individuals who were admitted for ACS and had suboptimal pre-ACS adherence to physical activity, heart-healthy diet, and/or medications, defined by a Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) score <15/18. During hospitalization, participants underwent quantitative assessments of sociodemographic, medical, and psychological variables, followed by in-depth semi-structured interviews to explore intentions, plans, and perceived barriers related to post-discharge health behavior changes. The MOS SAS was readministered at 3 months and participants were designated as persistently nonadherent (MOS SAS <15; n = 9) or newly adherent (n = 13). Interviews were transcribed and coded by trained raters via content analysis, and quantitative variables were compared between groups using chi-square analysis and independent-samples t-tests. On our primary qualitative analysis, we found that participants with vaguely described intentions/plans regarding health behavior change, and those who focused on barriers to change that were perceived as static, were more likely to be persistently nonadherent. On exploratory quantitative analyses, greater medical burden, diabetes, depressive symptoms, and low optimism/positive affect at baseline were associated with subsequent post-ACS nonadherence (all p < .05). In conclusion, this appears to be the first study to prospectively examine all of these constructs in hospitalized ACS patients, and we found that specific factors were associated with nonadherence to key health behaviors 3 months later. Therefore it may be possible to predict future nonadherence in ACS patients, even during hospitalization, and specific interventions during admission may be indicated to prevent adverse outcomes among patients at highest risk for post-ACS nonadherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.