Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25495633›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014

Exact reconstruction of gene regulatory networks using compressive sensing.

Young Hwan Chang, Joe W Gray, Claire J Tomlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inferring dynamic topology for decoding spatiotemporal structures in complex heterogeneous networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Networks based on Repairing Sparse Low-rank Matrices.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Young Hwan ChangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, CA, USA. yhchang@berkeley.edu.
Joe W GrayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and the Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. grayjo@ohsu.edu.
Claire J TomlinDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, CA, USA. tomlin@eecs.berkeley.edu.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Systems-Based Predictions of Responses to Cancer TherapyU54CA112970 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 2004 to 2014
$27.1M
TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COVERT, MARKUS W · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
NCI NIH HHS 5U54CA112970-08NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe consider the problem of reconstructing a gene regulatory network structure from limited time series gene expression data, without any a priori knowledge of connectivity. We assume that the network is sparse, meaning the connectivity among genes is much less than full connectivity. We develop a method for network reconstruction based on compressive sensing, which takes advantage of the network's sparseness.

resultsFor the case in which all genes are accessible for measurement, and there is no measurement noise, we show that our method can be used to exactly reconstruct the network. For the more general problem, in which hidden genes exist and all measurements are contaminated by noise, we show that our method leads to reliable reconstruction. In both cases, coherence of the model is used to assess the ability to reconstruct the network and to design new experiments. We demonstrate that it is possible to use the coherence distribution to guide biological experiment design effectively. By collecting a more informative dataset, the proposed method helps reduce the cost of experiments. For each problem, a set of numerical examples is presented.

conclusionsThe method provides a guarantee on how well the inferred graph structure represents the underlying system, reveals deficiencies in the data and model, and suggests experimental directions to remedy the deficiencies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalSignal TransductionBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25495633
PMCPMC4308013
OpenAlexW2096678291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.