Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25495468›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2015

Risk factors of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 in a prospective household cohort in the general population: results from the CoPanFlu-France cohort.

Rosemary M Delabre, Nathanael Lapidus, Nicolas Salez, Yohann Mansiaux, Xavier de Lamballerie, Fabrice Carrat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Household Transmission of Influenza Virus.Trends in microbiology · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rosemary M DelabreINSERM, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Nathanael Lapidus
Nicolas Salez
Yohann Mansiaux
Xavier de Lamballerie
Fabrice Carrat
Inserm · FRÉcole des Hautes Études en Santé Publique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CoPanFlu-France household cohort was set up in 2009 to identify risk factors of infection by the pandemic A/H1N1 (H1N1pdm09) virus in the general population.

objectivesTo investigate the determinants of infection during the 2010-2011 season, the first complete influenza season of study follow-up for this cohort. PATIENTS/

methodsPre- and post-epidemic blood samples were collected for all subjects, and nasal swabs were obtained in all subjects from households where an influenza-like illness was reported. Cases were defined as either a fourfold increase in the serological titer or a laboratory-confirmed H1N1pdm09 on a nasal swab, with either RT-PCR or multiplex PCR. Risk factors for H1N1pdm09 infections were explored, without any pre-specified hypothesis, among 167 individual, collective and environmental covariates via generalized estimating equations modeling. We adopted a multimodel selection procedure to control for model selection uncertainty.

resultsThis analysis is based on a sample size of 1121 subjects. The final multivariable model identified one risk factor (history of asthma, OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.02-4.62) and three protective factors: pre-epidemic serological titer (OR = 0.51 per doubling of the titer; 95% CI: 0.39-0.67), green tea consumption a minimum of two times a week (OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18-0.84), and proportion of subjects in the household always covering their mouth while coughing/sneezing (OR = 0.93 per 10% increase; 95% CI: 0.86-1.00).

conclusionThis exploratory study provides further support of previously reported risk factors and highlights the importance of collective protective behaviors in the household. Further analyses will be conducted to explore these findings.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypePandemicsAdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, ViralChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFamily HealthFemaleFranceHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalAntibodies, ViralCohort studiesFranceinfluenza A virus, H1N1 subtyperisk factor

Identifiers

PMID25495468
PMCPMC4280818
OpenAlexW2093052431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.