Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25495074›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2014

Nucleolus precursor body (NPB): a distinct structure in mammalian oocytes and zygotes.

Hirohisa Kyogoku, Tomoya S Kitajima, Takashi Miyano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nucleoskeletal Proteins in Early Embryogenesis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. How Early-Life Programming During Embryogenesis Imprints Cellular Memory.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nucleolar-basedGenes & development · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hirohisa Kyogokua Laboratory for Chromosome Segregation ; Center for Developmental Biology ; RIKEN , Kobe , Japan.
Tomoya S Kitajima
Takashi Miyano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleoli in mammalian oocytes and zygotes, sometimes referred to as nucleolus precursor bodies (NPBs), are compact and morphologically different from nucleoli in somatic cells. We applied a unique NPB analyzing method "enucleolation" technique to zygotes to remove the NPBs. It has been reported that oocyte NPBs are essential for embryonic development; in their absence, the oocytes complete maturation and can be fertilized, but no nucleoli are formed in the zygotes and embryos, leading to developmental failure. However, we found that when NPBs were removed from zygotes, the zygotes developed successfully to live-born pups. These results indicated that oocyte NPBs are essential for embryonic development, but zygote NPBs are not. In addition, the enucleolated zygotes formed somatic-type nucleoli during early embryonic development, demonstrating that somatic-type nucleoli do not originate from zygote NPBs. We summarize our recent investigation on NPBs, and provide additional comments and findings.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCell NucleolusEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleIntranuclear Inclusion BodiesMammalsMiceOocytesPregnancyZygoteembryomouseNPBnucleolusoocyte

Identifiers

PMID25495074
PMCPMC4615675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.