Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25494980›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

Differential sensitivity of prostate tumor derived endothelial cells to sorafenib and sunitinib.

Alessandra Fiorio Pla, Alessia Brossa, Michela Bernardini, Tullio Genova, Guillaume Grolez, Arnaud Villers, Xavier Leroy, Natalia Prevarskaya, Dimitra Gkika, Benedetta Bussolati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ion Channel Profiling in Prostate Cancer: Toward Cell Population-Specific Screening.Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Alternative Strategies to Inhibit Tumor Vascularization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alessandra Fiorio Pla
Alessia Brossa
Michela Bernardini
Tullio Genova
Guillaume Grolez
Arnaud Villers
Xavier Leroy
Natalia Prevarskaya
Dimitra Gkika
Benedetta BussolatiDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Centre, University of Torino, via Nizza 52, 10126 Torino, Italy. benedetta.bussolati@unito.it.
University of Turin · ITInserm · FRUniversité de Lille · FRUniversité Lille Nord de France · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is the second leading cause of male cancer death in developed countries. Although the role of angiogenesis in its progression is well established, the efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy is not clearly proved. Whether this could depend on differential responses between tumor and normal endothelial cells has not been tested.

methodsWe isolated and characterized three lines of endothelial cells from prostate cancer and we tested the effect of Sunitinib and Sorafenib, and the combined treatment with the anti-androgen Casodex, on their angiogenic functions.

resultsEndothelial cells isolated from prostate tumors showed angiogenic properties and expression of androgen and vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptors. Sunitinib affected their proliferation, survival and motility while Sorafenib only showed a minor effect. At variance, Sunitinib and Sorafenib showed similar cytotoxic and anti-angiogenic effects on normal endothelial cells. Sorafenib and Sunitinib inhibited vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor2 phosphorylation of prostate cancer endothelial cells, while they differentially modulated Akt phosphorylation as no inhibitory effect of Sorafenib was observed on Akt activation. The combined treatment of Casodex reverted the observed resistance to Sorafenib both on cell viability and on Akt activation, whereas it did not modify the response to Sunitinib.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates a resistant behavior of endothelial cells isolated from prostate cancer to Sorafenib, but not Sunitinib. Moreover, it shows the benefit of a multi-target therapy combining anti-angiogenic and anti-hormonal drugs to overcome resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalEndothelial CellsHumansIndolesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNiacinamideAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersIndolesNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrrolesSorafenibSunitinibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Identifiers

PMID25494980
PMCPMC4295225
OpenAlexW2064934243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.