Observational studyJournal of clinical gastroenterology2015
Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Observational study in Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and Clinical Features of Sessile Serrated Polyps: A Systematic Review.Gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Linked-color imaging with or without artificial intelligence for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.Endoscopy · 2024Trial
- Will purposely seeking detect more colorectal polyps than routine performing during colonoscopy?Medicine · 2020Trial
- Bowel Preparation Quality for Optimal Sessile Serrated Lesions Detection: Is Excellent the Enemy of Good?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Excellent Bowel Preparation Quality Is Not Superior to Good Bowel Preparation Quality for Improving Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Article
- Regular feedback to individual endoscopists is associated with improved adenoma detection rate and other key performance indicators for colonoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Internet-Based Patient Education Prior to Colonoscopy: Prospective, Observational Study of a Single Center's Implementation, with Objective Assessment of Bowel Preparation Quality and Patient Satisfaction.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- Correlation Between Bowel Preparation and the Adenoma Detection Rate in Screening Colonoscopy.Annals of coloproctology · 2017Article
- Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Intraprocedural Cleansing for Screening Colonoscopy: Avoiding Brownouts.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
goalTo determine whether Excellent bowel cleansing is superior to Good for the detection of adenomas.
backgroundHigh quality colonoscopy requires Adequate bowel preparation. However, it is unknown whether adenoma detection differs between subcategories of Adequate cleansing. STUDY: We utilized a retrospective, cross-sectional study design to obtain data about patients undergoing colonoscopy at a single university center between August 31, 2011 and September 1, 2012. Primary outcome was adenoma detection rate (ADR), the percentage of patients with ≥1 adenoma. Secondary outcomes included adenomas per colonoscopy, adenoma distribution (proximal vs. distal), and detection of advanced adenomas, sessile serrated polyps (SSP), and cancer.
resultsThe electronic medical record of 5113 consecutive colonoscopies with Good or Excellent preparation was queried for preparation quality, colonoscopy indication, demographics, medical history, and history of adenoma and colon cancer. Exclusion criteria were age below 18 years, inflammatory bowel disease, or familial polyposis. Adenoma detection was not superior with Excellent cleansing as compared with Good for ADR [respectively, 26% vs. 29%, odds ratio 0.97 (0.85, 1.11), P=0.618] or adenomas per colonoscopy [respectively, 0.437 vs. 0.499, incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.98 (0.90, 1.07), P=0.705]. Excellent cleansing demonstrated superior detection of SSPs [IRR 1.66 (1.14, 2.40), P=0.008] and advanced adenomas [IRR 1.37 (1.09, 1.72), P=0.007] but not colon cancer [odds ratio 0.286 (0.083, 0.985), P=0.0474].
conclusionsADR is not significantly different between the Adequate subcategories of Excellent and Good. However, Excellent cleansing is associated with superior detection of advanced adenomas and SSPs. If confirmed, achieving an Excellent preparation may improve colonoscopy performance in the proximal colon where SSPs primarily occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.