Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25494358›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2015

The impact of the organization of high-dependency care on acute hospital mortality and patient flow for critically ill patients.

Hannah Wunsch, David A Harrison, Andrew Jones, Kathryn Rowan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Outcomes of Emergency Medical Patients Admitted to an Intermediate Care Unit With Detailed Admission Guidelines.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah Wunsch1 Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David A Harrison
Andrew Jones
Kathryn Rowan

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024156 · NCRR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2006 to 2011
$53.0M
Use of intensive care services for elderly patients undergoing high risk surgicalK08AG038477 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WUNSCH, HANNAH · 2010 to 2014
$628k
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024156NIA NIH HHS K08 AG038477NIA NIH HHS K08AG038477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLittle is known about the utility of provision of high-dependency care (HDC) that is in a geographically separate location from a primary intensive care unit (ICU).

objectivesTo determine whether the availability of HDC in a geographically separate unit affects patient flow or mortality for critically ill patients.

methodsAdmissions to ICUs in the United Kingdom, from 2009 to 2011, who received Level 3 intensive care in the first 24 hours after admission and subsequently Level 2 HDC. We compared differences in patient flow and outcomes for patients treated in hospitals providing some HDC in a geographically separate unit (dual HDC) with patients treated in hospitals providing all HDC in the same unit as intensive care (integrated HDC) using multilevel mixed effects models. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsIn 192 adult general ICUs, 21.4% provided dual HDC. Acute hospital mortality was no different for patients cared for in ICUs with dual HDC versus those with integrated HDC (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94 [0.86-1.03]; P = 0.16). Dual HDC was associated with a decreased likelihood of a delayed discharge from the primary unit. However, total duration of critical care and the likelihood of discharge from the primary unit at night were increased with dual HDC.

conclusionsAvailability of HDC in a geographically separate unit does not impact acute hospital mortality. The potential benefit of decreasing delays in discharge should be weighed against the increased total duration of critical care and greater likelihood of a transfer out of the primary unit at night.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAPACHECohort StudiesCosts and Cost AnalysisCritical CareCritical IllnessDiagnosis-Related GroupsFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsIntermediate Care FacilitiesLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Transferintensive care unitintermediate care facilitieslength of staymortality

Identifiers

PMID25494358
PMCPMC4347435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.