Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25494269›Full record

ArticleThe New England journal of medicine2014

Quality and equity of care in U.S. hospitals.

Amal N Trivedi, Wato Nsa, Leslie R M Hausmann, Jonathan S Lee, Allen Ma, Dale W Bratzler, Maria K Mor, Kristie Baus, Fiona Larbi, Michael J Fine

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The New England journal of medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Racial disparities in multiple sclerosis quality of care metrics.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in postoperative outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: a national inpatient analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amal N TrivediFrom the Providence Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center and the Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health - both in Providence, RI (A.N.T.); Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality (W.N., A.M.) and the Colleges of Medicine and Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (D.W.B.) - both in Oklahoma City; VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, VA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion (L.R.M.H., M.K.M., M.J.F.), Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (L.R.M.H, J.S.L., M.J.F.), and the Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh (M.K.M) - all in Pittsburgh; and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore (K.B., F.L.).
Wato Nsa
Leslie R M Hausmann
Jonathan S Lee
Allen Ma
Dale W Bratzler
Maria K Mor
Kristie Baus
Fiona Larbi
Michael J Fine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly every U.S. hospital publicly reports its performance on quality measures for patients who are hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. Because performance rates are not reported according to race or ethnic group, it is unclear whether improvements in equity of care have accompanied aggregate improvements in health care quality over time.

methodsWe assessed performance rates for quality measures covering three conditions (six measures for acute myocardial infarction, four for heart failure, and seven for pneumonia). These rates, adjusted for patient- and hospital-level covariates, were compared among non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic patients who received care between 2005 and 2010 in acute care hospitals throughout the United States.

resultsAdjusted performance rates for the 17 quality measures improved by 3.4 to 57.6 percentage points between 2005 and 2010 for white, black, and Hispanic adults (P<0.001 for all comparisons). In 2005, as compared with adjusted performance rates for white patients, adjusted performance rates were more than 5 percentage points lower for black patients on 3 measures (range of differences, 12.3 to 14.2) and for Hispanic patients on 6 measures (5.6 to 14.5). Gaps decreased significantly on all 9 of these measures between 2005 and 2010, with adjusted changes for differences between white patients and black patients ranging from -8.5 to -11.8 percentage points and from -6.2 to -15.1 percentage points for differences between white patients and Hispanic patients. Decreasing differences according to race or ethnic group were attributable to more equitable care for white patients and minority patients treated in the same hospital, as well as to greater performance improvements among hospitals that disproportionately serve minority patients.

conclusionsImproved performance on quality measures for white, black, and Hispanic adults hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia was accompanied by increased racial and ethnic equity in performance rates both within and among U.S. hospitals. (Funded by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Career Development Program.).

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAdultBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleHealthcare DisparitiesHeart FailureHispanic or LatinoHospitalsHumansMyocardial InfarctionPneumoniaQuality Indicators, Health CareUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID25494269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.