ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2014
Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical validation of the Neonatal Skin Condition Score to Brazilian Portuguese.
Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Griffiths Scales of Child Development 3rd Edition: normalization for the Brazilian population.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Skin injuries in newborns hospitalized in neonatal intensive care: a cross-sectional study.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2024Article
- Incidence of nasal pressure injury in preterm infants on nasal mask noninvasive ventilation.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023Observational
- Transcultural adaptation of the children's anxiety questionnaire in Brazil.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Assessment of the quality of a software application for the prevention of skin lesions in newborns.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the process of cross-cultural adaptation and clinical validation of the Neonatal Skin Condition Score.
methodsThis methodological cross-cultural adaptation study included five steps: initial translation, synthesis of the initial translation, back translation, review by an Committee of Specialists and testing of the pre-final version, and an observational cross-sectional study with analysis of the psychometric properties using the Adjusted Kappa, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, and Bland-Altman Method statistical tests. A total of 38 professionals were randomly recruited to review the clarity of the adapted instrument, and 47 newborns hospitalized in the Neonatology Unit of the Clinical Hospital of Porto Alegre were selected by convenience for the clinical validation of the instrument.
resultsThe adapted scale showed approximately 85% clarity. The statistical tests showed moderate to strong intra and interobserver item to item reliability and from strong to very strong in the total score, with a variation of less than 2 points among the scores assigned by the nurses to the patients.
conclusionsThe scale was adapted and validated to Brazilian Portuguese. The psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Neonatal Skin Condition Score instrument were similar to the validation results of the original scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.