Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25493679›Full record

ArticleRevista latino-americana de enfermagem2014

Nasal septum injury in preterm infants using nasal prongs.

Suely de Fátima Santos Freire Bonfim, Maria Gorete Lucena de Vasconcelos, Nayara Francisca Cabral de Sousa, Daiana Vieira Câmara da Silva, Luciana Pedrosa Leal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suely de Fátima Santos Freire BonfimUnidade Neonatal, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Maria Gorete Lucena de VasconcelosDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Nayara Francisca Cabral de SousaUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Daiana Vieira Câmara da Silvaaff4.
Luciana Pedrosa LealDepartamento de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRArab Foundations Forum · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the incidence and risk factors associated with nasal septum injury in premature infants using reused and new nasal prongs.

methodThe study was a cohort from an open therapeutic intervention. The sample included 70 infants with a gestational age inferior to 37 weeks, who used nasal prongs and were hospitalized at the neonatal service of a hospital in Recife-PE, in the Northeast of Brazil. The data were collected in patient files through the assessment of the application of the device and of the nasal septum. Multinomial Logistic Regression and Survival analyses were applied.

resultsThe incidence of nasal injury corresponded to 62.9%. In the multiple analysis, only the length of the infant's treatment was a determinant factor for the occurrence and severity of the injuries.

conclusionThe type of nasal prong does not serve as a risk factor for the nasal injury. The high incidence of nasal injury indicates the need to adapt the nursing care with emphasis on prevention.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleNasal SeptumNoninvasive VentilationProspective StudiesRisk FactorsWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID25493679
PMCPMC4292671
OpenAlexW2150825405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.