Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25493548›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Geometry-Driven Polarity in Motile Amoeboid Cells.

Oliver Nagel, Can Guven, Matthias Theves, Meghan Driscoll, Wolfgang Losert, Carsten Beta

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanotopography modulates intracellular excitable systems through cytoskeleton actuation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A minimal computational model for three-dimensional cell migration.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms of Cell Polarization.Current opinion in systems biology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. From damage response to action potentials: early evolution of neural and contractile modules in stem eukaryotes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oliver NagelInstitute of Physics und Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Can GuvenDepartment of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Matthias ThevesInstitute of Physics und Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Meghan DriscollDepartment of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Wolfgang LosertDepartment of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Carsten BetaInstitute of Physics und Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

Using Controlled 2D and 3D Nanotopography to Unravel Tactile Senses of Motile CelR01GM085574 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FOURKAS, JOHN T, LOSERT, WOLFGANG · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motile eukaryotic cells, such as leukocytes, cancer cells, and amoeba, typically move inside the narrow interstitial spacings of tissue or soil. While most of our knowledge of actin-driven eukaryotic motility was obtained from cells that move on planar open surfaces, recent work has demonstrated that confinement can lead to strongly altered motile behavior. Here, we report experimental evidence that motile amoeboid cells undergo a spontaneous symmetry breaking in confined interstitial spaces. Inside narrow channels, the cells switch to a highly persistent, unidirectional mode of motion, moving at a constant speed along the channel. They remain in contact with the two opposing channel side walls and alternate protrusions of their leading edge near each wall. Their actin cytoskeleton exhibits a characteristic arrangement that is dominated by dense, stationary actin foci at the side walls, in conjunction with less dense dynamic regions at the leading edge. Our experimental findings can be explained based on an excitable network model that accounts for the confinement-induced symmetry breaking and correctly recovers the spatio-temporal pattern of protrusions at the leading edge. Since motile cells typically live in the narrow interstitial spacings of tissue or soil, we expect that the geometry-driven polarity we report here plays an important role for movement of cells in their natural environment.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonCell PolarityCell WallComputer SimulationDictyosteliumLab-On-A-Chip DevicesModels, BiologicalMovement

Identifiers

PMID25493548
PMCPMC4262208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.