Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25493162›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2012

Recurrent implantation failure is more frequently seen in female patients with poor prognosis.

Pelin Ocal, Tayfur Cift, Berk Bulut, Eray Balcan, Ismail Cepni, Begum Aydogan, Tulay Irez

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pelin OcalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tayfur CiftMinistry of Health of Turkey, Malkara State Hospital, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Berk BulutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eray BalcanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ismail CepniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Begum AydoganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tulay IrezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRIstanbul University · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluated the characteristics and results of patients who suffer from recurrent implantation failure (RIF). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this cross sectional study, a total of 2183 cases who were evaluated retrospectively at the Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, IVF unit between 2000-2007. According to the data gathered, we included 1822 cases in this study. We compared 185 patients with RIF to 1637 women without RIF.

resultsPregnancy was achieved by 589 couples out of 1822 (32%). The implantation rate was 10%, which declined to 5.8% after the fourth attempt. In the RIF group, patients' mean age was higher and there were more overweight women, the duration of fertility was longer, day 3 follicle stimulation hormone (FSH) levels and the total gonadotropin dose administered were higher, mean level of Estradiol (E2) on the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) day was lower, and the mean level of progesterone on the hCG day was elevated compared to the non-RIF group. Although the comparison of MII oocyte number was not significant, the mean number of fertilized oocytes was found to be significant in favor of the non-RIF group. The endometrial thicknesses were found to be similar for both groups. Comparison of sperm motility and morphology were statistically significant in favor of the RIF group.

conclusionIn our study, we have found that the group with RIF were comprised of patients with poor prognosis who were older, overweight, had a longer infertility duration, a higher FSH level, and needed more gonadotropin doses in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Sperm motility and morphology were better in the RIF group compared to the non-RIF group, and multiple pregnancy rates were lower in RIF patients.

Indexed as

ImplantationIn Vitro FertilizationRecurrent Implantation Failure

Identifiers

PMID25493162
PMCPMC4258244
OpenAlexW2279922973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.