ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2014
Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Yield of Combining CT Colonoscopy and Endoscopy to Investigate Colorectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Caecal perforation from CT colonography: an unexpected complication.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- When to Perform a Colonoscopy in Diverticular Disease and Why: A Personalized Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Efficacy of CO₂ Infusion for Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiography with Computed Tomographic Colonography.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021Article
- Ultra-low dose CT colonography with automatic tube current modulation and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction: Effects on radiation exposure and image quality.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019Article
- Probe-based three-dimensional confocal laser endomicroscopy of brain tumors: technical note.Cancer management and research · 2018Article
- Computed tomographic colonography in the evaluation of a case of giant colonic diverticulum.BJR case reports · 2017Article
- Advanced imaging of colorectal cancer: From anatomy to molecular imaging.Insights into imaging · 2016Review
- Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.World journal of radiology · 2016Review
- Diagnostic imaging and radiation exposure in inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Short Occult Retractile Fibrous Scar Causing Exclusive Retrograde Stenosis of the Sigmoid Colon: An Incidental Diagnosis Nineteen Years After a Single Episode of Colonic Diverticulitis.Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology · 2016Article
- Colorectal cancer diagnosis: Pitfalls and opportunities.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2015Review
- Clinically Occult Rectal Carcinoma Identified in a Case ofIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Twenty years after its introduction, computed tomographic colonography (CTC) has reached its maturity, and it can reasonably be considered the best radiological diagnostic test for imaging colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyps. This examination technique is less invasive than colonoscopy (CS), easy to perform, and standardized. Reduced bowel preparation and colonic distention using carbon dioxide favor patient compliance. Widespread implementation of a new image reconstruction algorithm has minimized radiation exposure, and the use of dedicated software with enhanced views has enabled easier image interpretation. Integration in the routine workflow of a computer-aided detection algorithm reduces perceptual errors, particularly for small polyps. Consolidated evidence from the literature shows that the diagnostic performances for the detection of CRC and large polyps in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals are similar to CS and are largely superior to barium enema, the latter of which should be strongly discouraged. Favorable data regarding CTC performance open the possibility for many different indications, some of which are already supported by evidence-based data: incomplete, failed, or unfeasible CS; symptomatic, elderly, and frail patients; and investigation of diverticular disease. Other indications are still being debated and, thus, are recommended only if CS is unfeasible: the use of CTC in CRC screening and in surveillance after surgery for CRC or polypectomy. In order for CTC to be used appropriately, contraindications such as acute abdominal conditions (diverticulitis or the acute phase of inflammatory bowel diseases) and surveillance in patients with a long-standing history of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease and in those with hereditary colonic syndromes should not be overlooked. This will maximize the benefits of the technique and minimize potential sources of frustration or disappointment for both referring clinicians and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.