Trial reportThe oncologist2015
Age-related changes in nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: influence of chronological versus functional age.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-toxicity analyses of nab-paclitaxel after pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2024Trial
- A Phase II Trial of Older Adults With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving nab-Paclitaxel: Melding the Fields of Geriatrics and Oncology.Clinical breast cancer · 2019Trial
- Comprehensive scientific insights on plant inspired nano therapeutics as the missing piece of the breast cancer puzzle.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Cancer Vaccines and Beyond: The Transformative Role of Nanotechnology in Immunotherapy.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Bone Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Recent Advances and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Natural Taxanes: From Plant Composition to Human Pharmacology and Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel: Worthy of Further Study in Sarcomas.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Breast cancer and aging: Standing on the shoulders of a giant.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2020Review
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Paclitaxel Monotherapy: An Updated Literature Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2018Review
- Targeted chemotherapy with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in metastatic breast cancer: which benefit for which patients?Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2016Review
- Effect of age on drug metabolism in women with breast cancer.Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology · 2015Review
- Taxanes in the elderly patient with metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluated age-related changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
methodsForty patients received nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks followed by a 1-week break) as first- or second-line chemotherapy. Blood samples were collected for analysis, and response was assessed every two cycles. Planned statistical analyses included linear regression to examine the relationship between age and pharmacokinetic variables (ln clearance [CL] and ln area under the curve [AUC]) and two-sided two-sample t tests to evaluate age differences in pharmacodynamic variables. The association between chemotherapy toxicity risk scores and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables including grade ≥ 3 toxicity were examined post hoc.
resultsOf 40 patients enrolled, 39 (98%) were evaluable (mean age: 60 years; range: 30-81 years). A partial response was achieved in 31%, and 38% had stable disease. There was a borderline positive association between age and 24-hour ln AUC (slope = 0.011; SE = 0.006; p = .055). Grade 3 toxicity was experienced by 26% (8% hematologic, 18% nonhematologic). There were no differences in age based on the presence of grade 3 toxicity (p = .75), dose reductions (p = .38), or dose omissions (p = .15). A significant association was noted between chemotherapy toxicity risk score category and presence of grade 3 toxicity (toxicity rate by risk score category: low, 5 of 30 patients; medium, 3 of 6 patients; high, 2 of 3 patients; p = .041).
conclusionA borderline significant relationship exists between age and 24-hour AUC, but no differences were noted for pharmacodynamic variables (grade 3 toxicity, dose reductions, or dose omissions) based on age. There is an association between toxicity risk score and grade ≥ 3 chemotherapy toxicity and pharmacokinetic variables. The treatment is well tolerated across all age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.