Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25492886›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2014

Phosphoproteomic analyses reveal novel cross-modulation mechanisms between two signaling pathways in yeast.

Stefania Vaga, Marti Bernardo-Faura, Thomas Cokelaer, Alessio Maiolica, Christopher A Barnes, Ludovic C Gillet, Björn Hegemann, Frank van Drogen, Hoda Sharifian, Edda Klipp and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The regulatory landscape of the yeast phosphoproteome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefania VagaDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Marti Bernardo-FauraEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), Cambridge, UK.
Thomas CokelaerEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), Cambridge, UK.
Alessio MaiolicaDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Christopher A BarnesDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Department of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ludovic C GilletDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Björn HegemannDepartment of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Frank van DrogenDepartment of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hoda SharifianDepartment of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Edda KlippDepartment of Biology, Theoretical Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias PeterDepartment of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Julio Saez-RodriguezEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), Cambridge, UK.
Ruedi AebersoldDepartment of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Faculty of Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland aebersold@imsb.biol.ethz.ch.
ETH Zurich · CHBioinformatics Institute · RUHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells respond to environmental stimuli via specialized signaling pathways. Concurrent stimuli trigger multiple pathways that integrate information, predominantly via protein phosphorylation. Budding yeast responds to NaCl and pheromone via two mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, the high osmolarity, and the mating pathways, respectively. To investigate signal integration between these pathways, we quantified the time-resolved phosphorylation site dynamics after pathway co-stimulation. Using shotgun mass spectrometry, we quantified 2,536 phosphopeptides across 36 conditions. Our data indicate that NaCl and pheromone affect phosphorylation events within both pathways, which thus affect each other at more levels than anticipated, allowing for information exchange and signal integration. We observed a pheromone-induced down-regulation of Hog1 phosphorylation due to Gpd1, Ste20, Ptp2, Pbs2, and Ptc1. Distinct Ste20 and Pbs2 phosphosites responded differently to the two stimuli, suggesting these proteins as key mediators of the information exchange. A set of logic models was then used to assess the role of measured phosphopeptides in the crosstalk. Our results show that the integration of the response to different stimuli requires complex interconnections between signaling pathways.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionDown-RegulationMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesModels, TheoreticalOsmolar ConcentrationPheromonesPhosphorylationProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSodium ChlorideFUS3 protein, S cerevisiaeHOG1 protein, S cerevisiaeMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPheromonesProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSodium Chloridecell signaling networkcrosstalkHOG pathwaypheromone pathwayphosphoproteomics

Identifiers

PMID25492886
PMCPMC4300490
OpenAlexW2169414169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.