Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25492697›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2014

The effect of neural mobilisation on cervico-brachial pain: design of a randomised controlled trial.

Cato A Basson, Aimee Stewart, Witness Mudzi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07745088 (Impact on Patients With Neuromuscular and Musculoskeletal Conditions Associated With Benign Chronic Pain Using Atlas Profilapxis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07745088 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Impact on Patients With Neuromuscular and Musculoskeletal Conditions Associated With Benign Chronic Pain Using Atlas Profilapxis

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion Nacional SomosRan2022 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsPain, Pain InterventionArmsPlacebo, Atlasprofilax Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cato A BassonPrivate practice, 407 Stonewall Avenue, Faerie Glen 0043, PO Box 74745, Lynnwood Ridge 0040, South Africa. annalieb@intekom.co.za.
Aimee Stewart
Witness Mudzi
University of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeck pain is a common musculoskeletal complaint and is often associated with shoulder or arm pain. There is a paucity of information on effective treatment for neck and arm pain, such as radiculopathy or cervico-brachial pain. Guidelines recommend neck mobilisation/ manipulation, exercises and advice as the treatment for neck pain, and neck and arm pain. There are a few studies that have used neural mobilisation as the treatment for cervico-brachial pain. Although results seem promising the studies have small sample sizes that make it difficult to draw definite conclusions.

methodsA randomised controlled trial will be used to establish the effect of neural mobilisation on the pain, function and quality of life of patients with cervico-brachial pain. Patients will be recruited in four physiotherapy private practices and randomly assigned to usual care or usual care plus neural mobilisation. DISCUSSION: In clinical practice neural mobilisations is commonly used for cervico-brachial pain. Although study outcomes seem promising, most studies have small participant numbers. Targeting the neural structures as part of the management plan for a subgroup of patients with nerve mechano-sensitivity seems feasible. Patients with neuropathic pain and psychosocial risk factors such as catastrophising, respond poorly to treatment. Although a recent study found these patients less likely to respond to neural mobilisation, the current study will be able to assess whether neural mobilisation has any added benefit compared to usual care. The study will contribute to the knowledge base of treatment of patients with cervico-brachial pain. The findings of the study will be published in an appropriate journal.

trial registrationTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PACTR201303000500157.

Indexed as

Brachial PlexusExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleManipulation, SpinalNeck PainResearch DesignShoulder PainTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25492697
PMCPMC4295331
OpenAlexW2163141814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.