Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25491706›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2014

Sex- and gender-specific research priorities in cardiovascular resuscitation: proceedings from the 2014 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference Cardiovascular Resuscitation Research Workgroup.

Jane G Wigginton, Sarah M Perman, Gavin C Barr, Alyson J McGregor, Andrew C Miller, Anthony M Napoli, Anthony F Napoli, Basmah Safdar, Kevin R Weaver, Steven Deutsch and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Future directions in sex- and Gender-specific Emergency Medicine.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Erratum.2015 · Napoli, Anthony F [corrected to Napoli, Anthony M]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jane G WiggintonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Sarah M Perman
Gavin C Barr
Alyson J McGregor
Andrew C Miller
Anthony M Napoli
Anthony F Napoli
Basmah Safdar
Kevin R Weaver
Steven Deutsch
Tami Kayea
Lance Becker

Funding

Gender-Specific Research in Emergency Care: Investigate, Understand and TranslateR13NS087861 · NINDS · SOCIETY FOR ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE · PI SAFDAR, BASMAH · 2014 to 2014
$10k
NINDS NIH HHS 1R13NS087861-01NINDS NIH HHS R13 NS087861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant sex and gender differences in both physiology and psychology are readily acknowledged between men and women; however, data are lacking regarding differences in their responses to injury and treatment and in their ultimate recovery and survival. These variations remain particularly poorly defined within the field of cardiovascular resuscitation. A better understanding of the interaction between these important factors may soon allow us to dramatically improve outcomes in disease processes that currently carry a dismal prognosis, such as sudden cardiac arrest. As part of the 2014 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference "Gender-Specific Research in Emergency Medicine: Investigate, Understand, and Translate How Gender Affects Patient Outcomes," our group sought to identify key research questions and knowledge gaps pertaining to both sex and gender in cardiac resuscitation that could be answered in the near future to inform our understanding of these important issues. We combined a monthly teleconference meeting of interdisciplinary stakeholders from largely academic institutions with a focused interest in cardiovascular outcomes research, an extensive review of the existing literature, and an open breakout session discussion on the recommendations at the consensus conference to establish a prioritization of the knowledge gaps and relevant research questions in this area. We identified six priority research areas: 1) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest epidemiology and outcome, 2) customized resuscitation drugs, 3) treatment role for sex steroids, 4) targeted temperature management and hypothermia, 5) withdrawal of care after cardiac arrest, and 6) cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and implementation. We believe that exploring these key topics and identifying relevant questions may directly lead to improved understanding of sex- and gender-specific issues seen in cardiac resuscitation and ultimately improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Gender IdentitySex CharacteristicsAge FactorsBody TemperatureCardiopulmonary ResuscitationConsensus Statements as TopicEmergenciesEmergency MedicineFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHeart ArrestHumansHypothermiaMaleOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestResearchGonadal Steroid Hormones

Identifiers

PMID25491706
PMCPMC6406034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.