Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25491144›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2015

Prognostic evaluation of Nanog, Oct4, Sox2, PCNA, Ki67 and E-cadherin expression in gastric cancer.

Ning Li, Wenying Deng, Jie Ma, Bing Wei, Kang Guo, Wei Shen, Yanping Zhang, Suxia Luo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dimethyladenosine Transferase 1 Homolog Promotes Human Gastric Carcinoma Cell Proliferation and Inhibits Apoptosis via the AKT Pathway.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stem Cell Biomarkers and Tumorigenesis in Gastric Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Postoperative Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on the Survival of Stage III Gastric Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ning LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Henan Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliated Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenying Deng
Jie Ma
Bing Wei
Kang Guo
Wei Shen
Yanping Zhang
Suxia Luo
Zhengzhou University · CNHenan Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate expression and prognostic impact of Nanog, Oct4, Sox2, proliferation cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), Ki67 and E-cadherin in patients with gastric cancer (GC) by immunohistochemistry. A total of 69 patients were recruited who underwent gastrectomy between 2008 and 2009. We found that expression levels of Nanog, Oct4, Sox2, PCNA, Ki67 and E-cadherin were 26.1, 53.6, 49.3, 52.2, 60.9 and 60.9 %, respectively. Co-expression of more than any two proteins (defined as high-risk group) was detected in 43 of 69 (62.3 %) patients with GC. Only positive expression of Oct4 had relationship with lymphatic invasion (p = 0.013), and positive expression of Ki67 was correlated with T classification (p = 0.011). Furthermore, positive expression of Oct4 (p = 0.043), PCNA (p = 0.035) and Ki67 (p = 0.023) was significantly associated with poor 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). The same result was detected in patients with E-cadherin reduced expression (p = 0.022). But only PCNA positive expression predicted poor overall survival (p = 0.042) in univariate analysis. In addition, 3-year DFS was 20 % in high-risk group and 71 % in low-risk group. The same tendency was found between OS and co-expression of proteins. There was a remarkable difference between DFS or OS and co-expression of more than two proteins (p = 0.000). Multivariate analysis showed that E-cadherin and co-expression were independent prognostic factors of 3-year diseases-free survival. But only co-expression of more than two markers dramatically affected the survival of GC patients. These findings provide evidence that combined evaluation of Nanog, Oct4, Sox2, PCNA, Ki67 and E-cadherin may be a more powerful prognostic factor to predict relapse and distant metastasis for patients with GC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCell ProliferationDisease-Free SurvivalEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHomeodomain ProteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedNanog Homeobox ProteinBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsHomeodomain ProteinsKi-67 AntigenNanog Homeobox ProteinNANOG protein, humanOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25491144
OpenAlexW1996639057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.