ArticleAIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education2014
Assessment of the psychometric properties of HIV knowledge items across five countries.
Article in AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Validated HIV Knowledge Scales for Use with Adults and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.AIDS and behavior · 2022Pooled it
- Psychometric Evaluation of the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire-18 in a Black Canadian Population.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Measuring engagement in HIV care: Measurement invariance in three racial/ethnic patient groups.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2020Article
- Evaluating HIV Knowledge Questionnaires Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Multi-Study Item Response Theory Analysis.Archives of sexual behavior · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
HIV knowledge is commonly measured in HIV prevention research and program evaluations, but rigorous measurement standards are not always applied. Using item response theory methods, we examined the psychometric functioning of five commonly used HIV knowledge questions in five countries with varying HIV prevalence. We evaluated the internal consistency and measurement invariance of the items. The items performed poorly in all samples and the scale as a whole did not perform equally across samples. We conclude that current ways of measuring HIV knowledge are not adequate and recommend new items be developed, tested, and validated using psychometric methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.