Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25490691›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2015

Developments in understanding acquired immunity and innate susceptibility to norovirus and rotavirus gastroenteritis in children.

Daniel C Payne, Umesh D Parashar, Benjamin A Lopman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Structural basis for norovirus neutralization by an HBGA blocking human IgA antibody.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel C PayneDivision of Viral Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Umesh D Parashar
Benjamin A Lopman
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe discuss recent advances in the understanding of acquired immunity and susceptibility to the two major pediatric enteric viral pathogens, norovirus and rotavirus. RECENT

findingsThe prominent decline in severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in areas with mature rotavirus vaccination programmes has correspondingly unmasked the significant burden of disease associated with norovirus gastroenteritis among children. As epidemiologists and vaccinologists set their sights on this next vaccine target, we provide an update on norovirus vaccine development.In addition to these developments regarding acquired immunity, refinements to our understanding of innate susceptibility to norovirus has advanced. Significant recent advances now describe similar immunologic mechanisms in understanding susceptibility for both norovirus and rotavirus, involving histo-blood group antigenic associations, which may also prove to be genotype specific. SUMMARY: This information can potentially be used to tailor both applied and developmental efforts to public health interventions against these important pediatric enteric viral pathogens.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityCaliciviridae InfectionsChildChild, PreschoolDisease SusceptibilityGastroenteritisHumansIncidenceMolecular EpidemiologyNorovirusRotavirusRotavirus Infections

Identifiers

PMID25490691
PMCPMC4618547
OpenAlexW2036532780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.