Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25490604›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

A guide to modern quantitative fluorescent western blotting with troubleshooting strategies.

Samantha L Eaton, Maica Llavero Hurtado, Karla J Oldknow, Laura C Graham, Thomas W Marchant, Thomas H Gillingwater, Colin Farquharson, Thomas M Wishart

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The contribution of thePhotosynthesis research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Preclinical evaluation of the theranostic potential ofEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha L EatonDivision of Neurobiology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Maica Llavero HurtadoDivision of Neurobiology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Karla J OldknowDivision of Developmental Biology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Laura C GrahamDivision of Neurobiology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Thomas W MarchantDivision of Neurobiology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Thomas H GillingwaterCentre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh; Euan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research, University of Edinburgh.
Colin FarquharsonDivision of Developmental Biology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Thomas M WishartDivision of Neurobiology, The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh; Euan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neurone Disease Research, University of Edinburgh; t.m.wishart@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20251969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The late 1970s saw the first publicly reported use of the western blot, a technique for assessing the presence and relative abundance of specific proteins within complex biological samples. Since then, western blotting methodology has become a common component of the molecular biologists experimental repertoire. A cursory search of PubMed using the term "western blot" suggests that in excess of two hundred and twenty thousand published manuscripts have made use of this technique by the year 2014. Importantly, the last ten years have seen technical imaging advances coupled with the development of sensitive fluorescent labels which have improved sensitivity and yielded even greater ranges of linear detection. The result is a now truly Quantifiable Fluorescence based Western Blot (QFWB) that allows biologists to carry out comparative expression analysis with greater sensitivity and accuracy than ever before. Many "optimized" western blotting methodologies exist and are utilized in different laboratories. These often prove difficult to implement due to the requirement of subtle but undocumented procedural amendments. This protocol provides a comprehensive description of an established and robust QFWB method, complete with troubleshooting strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternBrain ChemistryColoring AgentsFluorescenceHorsesMiceMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalNerve Tissue ProteinsProteinsSheepColoring AgentsMuscle ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID25490604
PMCPMC4354265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.