Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25490542›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Socio-psychological factors driving adult vaccination: a qualitative study.

Ana Wheelock, Anam Parand, Bruno Rigole, Angus Thomson, Marisa Miraldo, Charles Vincent, Nick Sevdalis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Determinants of vaccine acceptance in Makokou, Gabon].The Pan African medical journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Determinants for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the general population: a systematic review of reviews.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana WheelockFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anam ParandFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Bruno RigoleSanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Angus ThomsonSanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marisa MiraldoImperial College Business School, London, United Kingdom.
Charles VincentImperial College Business School, London, United Kingdom.
Nick SevdalisFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBSanofi (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile immunization is one of the most effective and successful public health interventions, there are still up to 30,000 deaths in major developed economies each year due to vaccine-preventable diseases, almost all in adults. In the UK, despite comparatively high vaccination rates among ≥65 s (73%) and, to a lesser extent, at-risk ≤65 s (52%) in 2013/2014, over 10,000 excess deaths were reported the previous influenza season. Adult tetanus vaccines are not routinely recommended in the UK, but may be overly administered. Social influences and risk-perceptions of diseases and vaccines are known to affect vaccine uptake. We aimed to explore the socio-psychological factors that drive adult vaccination in the UK, specifically influenza and tetanus, and to evaluate whether these factors are comparable between vaccines.

methods20 in-depth, face-to-face interviews were conducted with members of the UK public who represented a range of socio-demographic characteristics associated with vaccination uptake. We employed qualitative interviewing approaches to reach a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing adult vaccination decisions. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data.

resultsParticipants were classified according to their vaccination status as regular, intermittent and non-vaccinators for influenza, and preventative, injury-led, mixed (both preventative and injury-led) and as non-vaccinators for tetanus. We present our finding around five overarching themes: 1) perceived health and health behaviors; 2) knowledge; 3) vaccination influences; 4) disease appraisal; and 5) vaccination appraisal.

conclusionThe uptake of influenza and tetanus vaccines was largely driven by participants' risk perception of these diseases. The tetanus vaccine is perceived as safe and sufficiently tested, whereas the changing composition of the influenza vaccine is a cause of uncertainty and distrust. To maximize the public health impact of adult vaccines, policy should be better translated into high vaccination rates through evidence-based implementation approaches.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSociological FactorsAdolescentAdultAgedFamilyFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedTetanus ToxoidVaccinationYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesTetanus Toxoid

Identifiers

PMID25490542
PMCPMC4260791
OpenAlexW1976942054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.