Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25490327›Full record

Observational studyJAMA2014

Association of the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reforms with mortality and readmissions among hospitalized Medicare patients.

Mitesh S Patel, Kevin G Volpp, Dylan S Small, Alexander S Hill, Orit Even-Shoshan, Lisa Rosenbaum, Richard N Ross, Lisa Bellini, Jingsan Zhu, Jeffrey H Silber

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mitesh S PatelCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Administration Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania2Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia3Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton S.
Kevin G VolppCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Administration Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania2Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia3Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton S.
Dylan S SmallThe Leonard Davis Institute, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia6Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Alexander S HillCenter for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Orit Even-ShoshanCenter for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania8Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lisa RosenbaumDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard N RossCenter for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lisa BelliniDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jingsan ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia4The Leonard Davis Institute, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jeffrey H SilberDepartment of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia7Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania8Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of.

Funding

Work Hour Regulation for Physician Trainees: Educational and Clinical OutcomesR01HL094593 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VOLPP, KEVIN G · 2009 to 2011
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094593NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL094593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePatient outcomes associated with the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) duty hour reforms have not been evaluated at a national level.

objectiveTo evaluate the association of the 2011 ACGME duty hour reforms with mortality and readmissions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsObservational study of Medicare patient admissions (6,384,273 admissions from 2,790,356 patients) to short-term, acute care, nonfederal hospitals (n = 3104) with principal medical diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, or congestive heart failure or a Diagnosis Related Group classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery. Of the hospitals, 96 (3.1%) were very major teaching, 138 (4.4%) major teaching, 442 (14.2%) minor teaching, 443 (14.3%) very minor teaching, and 1985 (64.0%) nonteaching. EXPOSURE: Resident-to-bed ratio as a continuous measure of hospital teaching intensity. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in 30-day all-location mortality and 30-day all-cause readmission, comparing patients in more intensive relative to less intensive teaching hospitals before (July 1, 2009-June 30, 2011) and after (July 1, 2011-June 30, 2012) duty hour reforms, adjusting for patient comorbidities, time trends, and hospital site.

resultsIn the 2 years before duty hour reforms, there were 4,325,854 admissions with 288,422 deaths and 602,380 readmissions. In the first year after the reforms, accounting for teaching hospital intensity, there were 2,058,419 admissions with 133,547 deaths and 272,938 readmissions. There were no significant postreform differences in mortality accounting for teaching hospital intensity for combined medical conditions (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96-1.03), combined surgical categories (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04), or any of the individual medical conditions or surgical categories. There were no significant postreform differences in readmissions for combined medical conditions (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02) or combined surgical categories (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03). For the medical condition of stroke, there were higher odds of readmissions in the postreform period (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.001-1.13). However, this finding was not supported by sensitivity analyses and there were no significant postreform differences for readmissions for any other individual medical condition or surgical category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among Medicare beneficiaries, there were no significant differences in the change in 30-day mortality rates or 30-day all-cause readmission rates for those hospitalized in more intensive relative to less intensive teaching hospitals in the year after implementation of the 2011 ACGME duty hour reforms compared with those hospitalized in the 2 years before implementation.

Indexed as

Personnel Staffing and SchedulingAccreditationAgedAged, 80 and overEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHeart FailureHospital MortalityHospitals, TeachingHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMedicareMyocardial InfarctionOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID25490327
PMCPMC5546100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.