Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489785›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2015

Daily rifapentine for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. A randomized, dose-ranging trial.

Susan E Dorman, Radojka M Savic, Stefan Goldberg, Jason E Stout, Neil Schluger, Grace Muzanyi, John L Johnson, Payam Nahid, Emily J Hecker, Charles M Heilig and 9 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02563327 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

TBTC Study 31 PK/PD: Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Rifapentine and Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Tuberculosis in the Study 31 Treatment Trial: Intensive PK Sampling

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2016 to 2021Enrolled2,516ConditionsTuberculosisArmsRifapentine, Moxifloxacin, Rifampin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide
NCT06253715 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Shortened Regimen for Drug-susceptible TB in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled860ConditionsTuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Tuberculosis, Lymph Node, Mycobacterium TuberculosisArmsIsoniazid, Rifampin, Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol, Rifapentine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review and meta-analysis of first-line tuberculosis drug concentrations and treatment outcomes.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Tackling the unknowns of short-course rifapentine-based treatment for active tuberculosis: a decision analysis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Two-stage activity-safety study of daily rifapentine during intensive phase treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2015
    Trial

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan E Dorman1 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Radojka M Savic
Stefan Goldberg
Jason E Stout
Neil Schluger
Grace Muzanyi
John L Johnson
Payam Nahid
Emily J Hecker
Charles M Heilig
Lorna Bozeman
Pei-Jean I Feng
Ruth N Moro
William MacKenzie
Kelly E Dooley
Eric L Nuermberger
Andrew Vernon
Marc Weiner
Tuberculosis Trials Consortium
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USJohns Hopkins University · USDuke University · USMUJHU Research Collaboration · UGUniversity of California, San Francisco · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Clinical Pharmacology Training ProgramT32GM066691 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Michael Ippolito · 2003 to 2026
$6.4M
Multidisciplinary Clinical Research and Mentoring in Tuberculosis DiagnosticsK24AI104830 · NIAID · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DORMAN, SUSAN E · 2015 to 2019
$790k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI104830NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleRifapentine has potent activity in mouse models of tuberculosis chemotherapy but its optimal dose and exposure in humans are unknown.

objectivesWe conducted a randomized, partially blinded dose-ranging study to determine tolerability, safety, and antimicrobial activity of daily rifapentine for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment.

methodsAdults with sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis were assigned rifapentine 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg or rifampin 10 mg/kg daily for 8 weeks (intensive phase), with isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. The primary tolerability end point was treatment discontinuation. The primary efficacy end point was negative sputum cultures at completion of intensive phase. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA total of 334 participants were enrolled. At completion of intensive phase, cultures on solid media were negative in 81.3% of participants in the rifampin group versus 92.5% (P = 0.097), 89.4% (P = 0.29), and 94.7% (P = 0.049) in the rifapentine 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg groups. Liquid cultures were negative in 56.3% (rifampin group) versus 74.6% (P = 0.042), 69.7% (P = 0.16), and 82.5% (P = 0.004), respectively. Compared with the rifampin group, the proportion negative at the end of intensive phase was higher among rifapentine recipients who had high rifapentine areas under the concentration-time curve. Percentages of participants discontinuing assigned treatment for reasons other than microbiologic ineligibility were similar across groups (rifampin, 8.2%; rifapentine 10, 15, or 20 mg/kg, 3.4, 2.5, and 7.4%, respectively).

conclusionsDaily rifapentine was well-tolerated and safe. High rifapentine exposures were associated with high levels of sputum sterilization at completion of intensive phase. Further studies are warranted to determine if regimens that deliver high rifapentine exposures can shorten treatment duration to less than 6 months. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00694629).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfricaAgedAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsAsiaDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth AmericaRifampinAntibiotics, AntitubercularAntitubercular AgentsRifampinrifapentinemycobacteriumrifamycinsrifapentinetherapeuticstuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID25489785
PMCPMC5447287
OpenAlexW2105096884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.