Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489557›Full record

ReviewMuscles, ligaments and tendons journal2014

Growth factor delivery vehicles for tendon injuries: Mesenchymal stem cells and Platelet Rich Plasma.

Alberto Guevara-Alvarez, Andreas Schmitt, Ryan P Russell, Andreas B Imhoff, Stefan Buchmann

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscles, ligaments and tendons journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomaterials for the Treatment of Tendon Injury.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Tendon injury: from biology to tendon repair.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto Guevara-AlvarezDepartment of Orthopaedic Sport Medicine, Klinikumrechts der Isar, Technische Universität Mün-chen, Germany.
Andreas SchmittDepartment of Orthopaedic Sport Medicine, Klinikumrechts der Isar, Technische Universität Mün-chen, Germany.
Ryan P RussellDepartment of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Andreas B ImhoffDepartment of Orthopaedic Sport Medicine, Klinikumrechts der Isar, Technische Universität Mün-chen, Germany.
Stefan BuchmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Sport Medicine, Klinikumrechts der Isar, Technische Universität Mün-chen, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundtendon tissue shows limited regeneration potential with formation of scar tissue and inferior mechanical properties. The capacity of several growth factors to improve the healing response and decrease scar formation is described in different preclinical studies. Besides the application of isolated growth factors, current research focuses on two further strategies to improve the healing response in tendon injuries: platelet rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).

objectivethe present review focuses on these two options and describes their potential to improve tendon healing.

resultsin vitro experiments and animal studies showed promising results for the use of PRP, however clinical controlled studies have shown a tendency of reduced pain related symptoms but no significant differences in overall clinical scores. On the other hand MSCs are not totally arrived in clinical use so that there is still a lack of randomized controlled trials. In basic research experiments they show an extraordinary paracrine activity, anti-inflammatory effect and the possibility to differentiate in tenocytes when different activating-factors are added.

conclusionpreclinical studies have shown promising results in improving tendon remodeling but the comparability of current literature is difficult due to different compositions. PRP and MSCs can act as efficient growth factor vehicles, however further studies should be performed in order to adequate investigate their clinical benefits in different tendon pathologies.

Indexed as

growth factor carriersregenerative medicinetendon regeneration

Identifiers

PMID25489557
PMCPMC4241431
OpenAlexW2327906432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.