Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489454›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2014

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation or conventional mechanical ventilation for neonatal continuous positive airway pressure failure.

Zohreh Badiee, Babak Nekooie, Majid Mohammadizadeh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02788110 (Prospective Crossover Comparison of Work of Breathing During Non-invasive Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02788110 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Crossover Comparison of Work of Breathing During Non-invasive Ventilation: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in Premature Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorArkansas Children's Hospital Research InstituteRan2016 to 2018Enrolled15ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Bronchopulmonary DysplasiaArmsNoninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV NAVA), Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Tidal volume transmission during non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation via RAMJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Trial
  3. Bubble NIPPV: Guidelines for Use.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zohreh BadieeDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Babak NekooieDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Majid MohammadizadehDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and Child Growth and Development Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the success rate of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for treatment of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure and prevention of conventional ventilation (CV) in preterm neonates.

methodsSince November 2012 to April 2013, a total number of 55 consecutive newborns with gestational ages of 26-35 weeks who had CPAP failure were randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The NIPPV group received NIPPV with the initial peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) of 16-20 cmH2O and frequency of 40-60 breaths/min. The CV group received PIP of 12-20 cmH2O and frequency of 40-60 breaths/min.

resultsAbout 74% of newborns who received NIPPV for management of CPAP failure responded to NIPPV and did not need intubation and mechanical ventilation. Newborns with lower postnatal age at entry to the study and lower 5 min Apgar score more likely had NIPPV failure. In addition, treatment failure was higher in newborns who needed more frequent doses of surfactant. Duration of oxygen therapy was 9.28 days in CV group and 7.77 days in NIPPV group (P = 0.050). Length of hospital stay in CV group and NIPPV groups were 48.7 and 41.7 days, respectively (P = 0.097).

conclusionsNIPPV could decrease the need for intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm infants with CPAP failure.

Indexed as

continuous positive airway pressure failureConventional ventilationnasal intermittent positive ventilationpremature infant

Identifiers

PMID25489454
PMCPMC4258678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.