ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2014
The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Radiological Issues and Systematic Approach.
Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpersonal Violence-Related Facial Fractures: 12-Year Trends and Surgical Outcomes in a Southern European Level-I Trauma Centre.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Facial trauma education in radiology: using surgeon feedback as the benchmark for success.Emergency radiology · 2024Article
- Comparing diagnosis of midfacial fractures by radiologists and plastic surgeons.Emergency radiology · 2022Article
- The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Orbital Fractures - Level 3 Tutorial.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2014Article
- The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Mandible Fractures- Level 2 Tutorial.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2014Article
- The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Midface Fractures - Level 3 Tutorial.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2014Article
- The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Mandible Fractures-Level 3 Tutorial.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2014Article
- The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Midface Fractures - Level 2 Tutorial.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2014Article
- Pediatric Maxillofacial Trauma: Insights into Diagnosis and Treatment of Mandibular Fractures in Pediatric Patients.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The AOCMF Classification Group developed a hierarchical three-level craniomaxillofacial (CMF) classification system with increasing level of complexity and details. The basic level 1 system differentiates fracture location in the mandible (code 91), midface (code 92), skull base (code 93), and cranial vault (code 94); the levels 2 and 3 focus on defining fracture location and morphology within more detailed regions and subregions. Correct imaging acquisition, systematic analysis, and interpretation according to the anatomic and surgical relevant structures in the CMF regions are essential for an accurate, reproducible, and comprehensive diagnosis of CMF fractures using that system. Basic principles for radiographic diagnosis are based on conventional plain films, multidetector computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. In this tutorial, the radiological issues according to each level of the classification are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.