ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2014
Predicting expression: the complementary power of histone modification and transcription factor binding data.
Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- CpG content-dependent associations between transcription factors and histone modifications.PloS one · 2021Article
- Molecular Structure, Binding Affinity, and Biological Activity in the Epigenome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- The single-cell eQTLGen consortium.eLife · 2020Article
- Identification of Key Histone Modifications and Their Regulatory Regions on Gene Expression Level Changes in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- On the problem of confounders in modeling gene expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Review
- Transcription factor binding site clusters identify target genes with similar tissue-wide expression and buffer against mutations.F1000Research · 2018Article
- RegulatorTrail: a web service for the identification of key transcriptional regulators.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Estimating the effects of transcription factors binding and histone modifications on gene expression levels in human cells.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Integrated analysis and transcript abundance modelling of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in developing secondary xylem.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Combining transcription factor binding affinities with open-chromatin data for accurate gene expression prediction.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Distributed gene expression modelling for exploring variability in epigenetic function.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Information theoretic approaches for inference of biological networks from continuous-valued data.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Functional transcription factor target discovery via compendia of binding and expression profiles.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Article
- Inference of transcriptional regulation in cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015Article
- Cofunctional Subpathways Were Regulated by Transcription Factor with Common Motif, Common Family, or Common Tissue.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- FlexDM: Simple, parallel and fault-tolerant data mining using WEKA.Source code for biology and medicine · 2015Article
- Modelling the conditional regulatory activity of methylated and bivalent promoters.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscription factors (TFs) and histone modifications (HMs) play critical roles in gene expression by regulating mRNA transcription. Modelling frameworks have been developed to integrate high-throughput omics data, with the aim of elucidating the regulatory logic that results from the interactions of DNA, TFs and HMs. These models have yielded an unexpected and poorly understood result: that TFs and HMs are statistically redundant in explaining mRNA transcript abundance at a genome-wide level.
resultsWe constructed predictive models of gene expression by integrating RNA-sequencing, TF and HM chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and DNase I hypersensitivity data for two mammalian cell types. All models identified genome-wide statistical redundancy both within and between TFs and HMs, as previously reported. To investigate potential explanations, groups of genes were constructed for ontology-classified biological processes. Predictive models were constructed for each process to explore the distribution of statistical redundancy. We found significant variation in the predictive capacity of TFs and HMs across these processes and demonstrated the predictive power of HMs to be inversely proportional to process enrichment for housekeeping genes.
conclusionsIt is well established that the roles played by TFs and HMs are not functionally redundant. Instead, we attribute the statistical redundancy reported in this and previous genome-wide modelling studies to the heterogeneous distribution of HMs across chromatin domains. Furthermore, we conclude that statistical redundancy between individual TFs can be readily explained by nucleosome-mediated cooperative binding. This could possibly help the cell confer regulatory robustness by rejecting signalling noise and allowing control via multiple pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.