Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489339›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2014

Predicting expression: the complementary power of histone modification and transcription factor binding data.

David M Budden, Daniel G Hurley, Joseph Cursons, John F Markham, Melissa J Davis, Edmund J Crampin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. On the problem of confounders in modeling gene expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inference of transcriptional regulation in cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David M BuddenSystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia ; NICTA Victoria Research Laboratory, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia.
Daniel G HurleySystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia.
Joseph CursonsSystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia.
John F MarkhamSystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia ; The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia.
Melissa J DavisSystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia.
Edmund J CrampinSystems Biology Laboratory, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia ; NICTA Victoria Research Laboratory, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia ; The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia ; ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology, 3010 Parkville, Australia ; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia ; School of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, 3010 Parkville, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUData61 · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscription factors (TFs) and histone modifications (HMs) play critical roles in gene expression by regulating mRNA transcription. Modelling frameworks have been developed to integrate high-throughput omics data, with the aim of elucidating the regulatory logic that results from the interactions of DNA, TFs and HMs. These models have yielded an unexpected and poorly understood result: that TFs and HMs are statistically redundant in explaining mRNA transcript abundance at a genome-wide level.

resultsWe constructed predictive models of gene expression by integrating RNA-sequencing, TF and HM chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing and DNase I hypersensitivity data for two mammalian cell types. All models identified genome-wide statistical redundancy both within and between TFs and HMs, as previously reported. To investigate potential explanations, groups of genes were constructed for ontology-classified biological processes. Predictive models were constructed for each process to explore the distribution of statistical redundancy. We found significant variation in the predictive capacity of TFs and HMs across these processes and demonstrated the predictive power of HMs to be inversely proportional to process enrichment for housekeeping genes.

conclusionsIt is well established that the roles played by TFs and HMs are not functionally redundant. Instead, we attribute the statistical redundancy reported in this and previous genome-wide modelling studies to the heterogeneous distribution of HMs across chromatin domains. Furthermore, we conclude that statistical redundancy between individual TFs can be readily explained by nucleosome-mediated cooperative binding. This could possibly help the cell confer regulatory robustness by rejecting signalling noise and allowing control via multiple pathways.

Indexed as

Gene expressionHistone modificationsPredictive modellingTranscriptional regulationTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID25489339
PMCPMC4258808
OpenAlexW2113604695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.