Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489256›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2014

Screening histories and contact with physicians as determinants of cervical cancer risk in Montreal, Quebec.

A R Spence, A Alobaid, P Drouin, P Goggin, L Gilbert, D Provencher, P Tousignant, J A Hanley, E L Franco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A R SpenceDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC.
A AlobaidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Khaled University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
P DrouinDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC.
P GogginInstitut national de santé publique du Québec, Montreal, QC.
L GilbertDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mc-Gill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC.
D ProvencherDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC.
P TousignantDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC. ; Direction de santé publique de l'Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, Montreal, QC.
J A HanleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC.
E L FrancoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC. ; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC.
McGill University · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer (cca) is largely a preventable disease if women receive regular screening, which allows for the detection and treatment of preinvasive lesions before they become invasive. Having been inadequately screened is a common finding among women who develop cca. Our primary objective was to determine the Pap screening histories of women diagnosed with cca in Montreal, Quebec. Secondary objectives were to determine the characteristics of women at greatest risk of cca and to characterize the level of physician contact those women had before developing cca.

methodsThe Invasive Cervical Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study, consisted of Greater Montreal residents diagnosed with histologically confirmed cca between 1998 and 2004. Respondents to the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey and a sample of women without cca obtained from Quebec medical billing records served as controls.

resultsDuring the period of interest, 568 women were diagnosed with cca. Immigrants and women speaking neither French nor English were at greatest risk of cca. Most of the women in the case group had been screened at least once during their lifetime (84.8%-90.4%), but they were less likely to have been screened within 3 years of diagnosis. Having received care from a family physician or a medical specialist other than a gynecologist within the 5 years before diagnosis was associated with a greater risk of cca development.

conclusionsOur findings provide evidence of the need for an organized population-based screening program. They also underscore the need for provider education to prevent missed opportunities for cca screening when at-risk women seek medical attention.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerPapanicolaou testscreening

Identifiers

PMID25489256
PMCPMC4257112
OpenAlexW2142785297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.