Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489231›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2014

Screening for BEST1 gene mutations in Chinese patients with bestrophinopathy.

Rong Tian, Guoxing Yang, Jing Wang, Youxin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Natural course of the vitelliform stage in best vitelliform macular dystrophy: a five-year follow-up study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rong TianDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China;
Guoxing YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xingtai Eye Hospital, Xingtai, Hebei, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China;
Youxin ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze BEST1 gene mutations in Chinese patients with bestrophinopathy and to describe the clinical features of these patients.

methodsThirteen patients from 12 unrelated Chinese families affected by bestrophinopathy were recruited and clinically evaluated with best-corrected visual acuity examination, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus examination and photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, electro-oculography, and electroretinography. Blood samples were collected for DNA extraction. Mutation analysis was performed by direct sequencing of the BEST1 gene. One hundred control chromosomes were also screened to exclude nonpathogenic polymorphisms.

resultsSeven patients showed clinical pictures of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and harbored heterozygous mutations compatible with autosomal dominant inheritance. Two novel mutations (p.T4I and p.A291V) and three reported mutations (p.R218C, p.Q293H, and p.D301G) were identified. Six patients carried BEST1 mutations on both alleles compatible with autosomal recessive inheritance. Compound heterozygous mutations were detected in four patients who presented a BVMD phenotype, while homozygous mutations were detected in two patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Mutation analysis revealed eight mutations. Four (p.Y33H, p.R130L, p.M163R, and c.519delA) were novel, and four (p.R13H, p.A195V, p.R255W, and p.W287*) had previously been reported.

conclusionsPatients with biallelic BEST1 mutations were common among Chinese patients with bestrophinopathy, and the phenotypes varied. The features and combinations of different BEST1 mutations as well as epistatic effects may influence phenotype expression. Our results expand the BEST1 mutation spectrum.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAllelesAsian PeopleBestrophinsChildChloride ChannelsDNA Mutational AnalysisElectroretinographyEpistasis, GeneticEye Diseases, HereditaryEye ProteinsFemaleGenetic TestingGenotypeHeterozygoteBEST1 protein, humanBestrophinsChloride ChannelsEye Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25489231
PMCPMC4225144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.