Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489224›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2014

Comparative transcriptome analysis of epithelial and fiber cells in newborn mouse lenses with RNA sequencing.

Thanh V Hoang, Praveen Kumar Raj Kumar, Sreeskandarajan Sutharzan, Panagiotis A Tsonis, Chun Liang, Michael L Robinson

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploiting autophagy and related pathways: pioneering new horizons in cataract therapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thanh V HoangDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Praveen Kumar Raj KumarDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Sreeskandarajan SutharzanDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Panagiotis A TsonisDepartment of Biology and Center for Tissue Regeneration and Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH.
Chun LiangDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Michael L RobinsonDepartment of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
Miami University · US

Funding

GENE REGULATION IN LENS REGENERATIONR01EY010540 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON · PI TSONIS, PANAGIOTIS A · 1995 to 2013
$3.3M
Gene Discovery in Mouse Models for Secondary CataractsR01EY016707 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON · PI TSONIS, PANAGIOTIS A · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010540NEI NIH HHS R01EY010540NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016707NEI NIH HHS R01EY16707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe ocular lens contains only two cell types: epithelial cells and fiber cells. The epithelial cells lining the anterior hemisphere have the capacity to continuously proliferate and differentiate into lens fiber cells that make up the large proportion of the lens mass. To understand the transcriptional changes that take place during the differentiation process, high-throughput RNA-Seq of newborn mouse lens epithelial cells and lens fiber cells was conducted to comprehensively compare the transcriptomes of these two cell types.

methodsRNA from three biologic replicate samples of epithelial and fiber cells from newborn FVB/N mouse lenses was isolated and sequenced to yield more than 24 million reads per sample. Sequence reads that passed quality filtering were mapped to the reference genome using Genomic Short-read Nucleotide Alignment Program (GSNAP). Transcript abundance and differential gene expression were estimated using the Cufflinks and DESeq packages, respectively. Gene Ontology enrichment was analyzed using GOseq. RNA-Seq results were compared with previously published microarray data. The differential expression of several biologically important genes was confirmed using reverse transcription (RT)-quantitative PCR (qPCR).

resultsHere, we present the first application of RNA-Seq to understand the transcriptional changes underlying the differentiation of epithelial cells into fiber cells in the newborn mouse lens. In total, 6,022 protein-coding genes exhibited differential expression between lens epithelial cells and lens fiber cells. To our knowledge, this is the first study identifying the expression of 254 long intergenic non-coding RNAs (lincRNAs) in the lens, of which 86 lincRNAs displayed differential expression between the two cell types. We found that RNA-Seq identified more differentially expressed genes and correlated with RT-qPCR quantification better than previously published microarray data. Gene Ontology analysis showed that genes upregulated in the epithelial cells were enriched for extracellular matrix production, cell division, migration, protein kinase activity, growth factor binding, and calcium ion binding. Genes upregulated in the fiber cells were enriched for proteosome complexes, unfolded protein responses, phosphatase activity, and ubiquitin binding. Differentially expressed genes involved in several important signaling pathways, lens structural components, organelle loss, and denucleation were also highlighted to provide insights into lens development and lens fiber differentiation.

conclusionsRNA-Seq analysis provided a comprehensive view of the relative abundance and differential expression of protein-coding and non-coding transcripts from lens epithelial cells and lens fiber cells. This information provides a valuable resource for studying lens development, nuclear degradation, and organelle loss during fiber differentiation, and associated diseases.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationEpithelial CellsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLens Capsule, CrystallineLens Cortex, CrystallineMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMolecular Sequence AnnotationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25489224
PMCPMC4225139
OpenAlexW317342805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.