Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489174›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2014

Differences in protein-protein association networks for lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study.

Anisha Datta, Sinjini Sikdar, Ryan Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anisha DattaLouisville Collegiate School and Department of Mathematics, University of Louisville.
Sinjini SikdarDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville.
Ryan GillDepartment of Mathematics, University of Louisville, Louisville.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various methods to determine the connectivity scores between groups of proteins associated with lung adenocarcinoma are examined. Proteins act together to perform a wide range of functions within biological processes. Hence, identification of key proteins and their interactions within protein networks can provide invaluable information on disease mechanisms. Differential network analysis provides a means of identifying differences in the interactions among proteins between two networks. We use connectivity scores based on the method of partial least squares to quantify the strength of the interactions between each pair of proteins. These scores are then used to perform permutation-based statistical tests. This examines if there are significant differences between the network connectivity scores for individual proteins or classes of proteins. The expression data from a study on lung adenocarcinoma is used in this study. Connectivity scores are computed for a group of 109 subjects who were in the complete remission and as well as for a group of 51 subjects whose cancer had progressed. The distributions of the connectivity scores are similar for the two networks yet subtle but statistically significant differences have been identified and their impact discussed.

Indexed as

association networksexpression datalung adenocarcinomanetworksprotein-proteinprotein-protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID25489174
PMCPMC4248347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.