Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25489169›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2014

Molecular docking analysis of RN18 and VEC5 in A3G-Vif inhibition.

Chanda Sinha, Anuradha Nischal, Kamlesh K Pant, Srinivas Bandaru, Anuraj Nayarisseri, Sanjay Khattri

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chanda SinhaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, King George's Medical University, (Erstwhile C.S.M. Medical University),Lucknow- 226 003, India.
Anuradha NischalDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, King George's Medical University, (Erstwhile C.S.M. Medical University),Lucknow- 226 003, India.
Kamlesh K PantDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, King George's Medical University, (Erstwhile C.S.M. Medical University),Lucknow- 226 003, India.
Srinivas BandaruInstitute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Osmania University, Hyderabad - 500 016, India.
Anuraj NayarisseriIn silico Research Laboratory, Eminent Biosciences, Vijaynagar, Indore - 452 010, India.
Sanjay KhattriDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, King George's Medical University, (Erstwhile C.S.M. Medical University),Lucknow- 226 003, India.
Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HIV-1 protein Vif is essential for in vivo viral replication that targets the human DNA-editing enzyme, APOBEC3G (A3G), which inhibits replication of retroviruses. The Vif-A3G interactions are believed to be important targets for antiviral drug development. Since the interactions of A3G and Vif evade the ubiquitination pathways in human host, the viral replication precedes which otherwise spreads infection. In this study, two potent Vif inhibitors RN 18 and VEC5 have been evaluated for their inhibitory potential employing ligand receptor and protein-protein interactions studies. VEC 5 showed better interaction with Vif than RN18. Predicted data show that VEC5 bound Vif and RN18 bound Vif showed diminished interaction to A3G compared to inhibitor unbound Vif. However, this should be further validated using in vitro studies.

Indexed as

Protein − Protein dockingRN18VEC5VifVIF-A3G interactionsVif inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25489169
PMCPMC4248342
OpenAlexW1995653320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.